Jaguar agreed to a timing chain payment in order to resolve a class action lawsuit alleging that some of its Land Rover and Range Rover vehicles had faulty timing chains. The settlement will start to help current and former buyers of Land Rover LR4 and Range Rover Sport cars from the model years 2012 to… Continue reading Jaguar Land Rover defective timing chains class action lawsuit settlement
Jaguar Land Rover defective timing chains class action lawsuit settlement
Jaguar agreed to a timing chain payment in order to resolve a class action lawsuit alleging that some of its Land Rover and Range Rover vehicles had faulty timing chains. The settlement will start to help current and former buyers of Land Rover LR4 and Range Rover Sport cars from the model years 2012 to… Continue reading Jaguar Land Rover defective timing chains class action lawsuit settlement
Samsung Electronics vs Apple Company Legal Analysis Case Study
Key Facts The case was in 2016 which pertains to a patent. In the case, the petitioners were the company of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; They petitioned to revise the previous court decision, in which The Apple Inc., won the case. The case is as follows: Apple claimed that Samsung has manufactured many models of… Continue reading Samsung Electronics vs Apple Company Legal Analysis Case Study
INFOSYS
Name – Ivan Rodrigues Subject – Law Roll no – M2114 Case Study INFOSYS Introduction – Infosys had disclosed that it had received whistleblower complaints alleging certain unethical practices by the top management. US market regulator Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had also investigated the matter. “The complaint, which was filed in the Eastern… Continue reading INFOSYS
Tesla
Name- Thomson Fernandes Subject – Law Roll no – M2153 Case Study Tesla INTRODUCTIONS – Tesla for “discriminating against its Black workers” after it “received hundreds of complaints from Tesla workers.” and “found evidence that Tesla’s Fremont factory is a racially segregated workplace where Black workers are subjected to racial slurs and discriminated against… Continue reading Tesla
Kotak Mahindra bank case in opposition to Bharat pe founder Ashneer Grover
Name: Kunal Jaggi, Roll No: M2123 Grover sought damages of Rs 500cr in Oct 2021 for a notional loss allegedly suffered due to the financial institution. Kotak says it responded to note, pursuing ‘suitable criminal movement’. A assertion from the Kotak Group stated that the Kotak Mahindra Bank became pursuing “suitable criminal movement” in opposition… Continue reading Kotak Mahindra bank case in opposition to Bharat pe founder Ashneer Grover
HCL Technologies V/S Nascent Information Technology Employees Senate (NITES)
Pune-based IT labour rights non-profit Nascent Information Technology Employees Senate (NITES) has filed an official government complaint against HCL Technologies, India’s third largest IT company, alleging the business has instituted a policy to claw back bonuses from resigning employees. What is India Payment of Bonus Act? Payment of bonus is the statutory liability on the… Continue reading HCL Technologies V/S Nascent Information Technology Employees Senate (NITES)
Steel Authority of India (SAIL) vs Tata Projects Limited
Name: Saurabh Chaudhari Roll no. M2144 Subject: Business Law STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED (SAIL) vs TATA PROJECTS LIMITED (TPL) The Case On 24-07-2007, the Steel Authority of India ltd (SAIL) issued a tender for the construction of a blast furnace. Two companies are Tata projects limited (TPL) which is an Indian corporation and DC… Continue reading Steel Authority of India (SAIL) vs Tata Projects Limited
Mrf vs Metro Tyres case
Plaintiff, MRF Limited is a company engaged in the business of manufacturing, marketing and sale of a series of tyres in India. One such series is known as MRF NV series “REVZ”. In order to publicize their goods, the plaintiff produced an advertisement, under the copyright regime of India. In October 2016, it came into… Continue reading Mrf vs Metro Tyres case
Canara Bank vs Mrs.Velangani on 7 July 2022
CHIRAG SHIRSAT M2110 Bangalore District Court Canara Bank vs Mrs.Velangani on 7 July 2022 PLAINTIFF CANARA BANK DEFENDANT MRS.VELANGANI In this case, the defendant approached the bank with a request to sanction a term loan for running her business. She submitted her application to the bank and the application was processed and examined by the… Continue reading Canara Bank vs Mrs.Velangani on 7 July 2022