Title – tourist places
Author –saish tandel (021330024405)
Introduction – Favourite tourist places like Goa, Manali, Rajasthan and Kerala, are known for their beautiful nature and historical theories of these places
Objective – To determine which place is tourist most attracting place
Data Collection – Data for this study was collected through a survey of 25 classmates, using a Google form that asked participants to rate each smartphone brand on a scale of 1 to 10. Following the data collection, single factor Anova was conducted to analyze the differences in ratings between the brands.
Data Analysis –
Anova: Single Factor |
||||||
SUMMARY |
||||||
Groups |
Count |
Sum |
Average |
Variance |
||
8 |
24 |
154 |
6.416667 |
1.210145 |
||
9 |
24 |
197 |
8.208333 |
1.041667 |
||
7 |
24 |
153 |
6.375 |
2.070652 |
||
8 |
24 |
170 |
7.083333 |
1.557971 |
||
ANOVA |
||||||
Source of Variation |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
P-value |
F crit |
Between Groups |
52.70833 |
3 |
17.56944 |
11.95112 |
1.11725E-06 |
2.703594 |
Within Groups |
135.25 |
92 |
1.470109 |
|||
Total |
187.9583 |
95 |
|
|
|
|
Null hypothesis(H0)– There is no significant difference in the average ratings between the four tourist places
Alternative Hypothesis (H1) – There is a significant difference in the average ratings between at least one pair of the four tourist places
As the P-value is 1.11725E-06 which is more than the significance level (0.05), this indicates that we would accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion – As we accept the null hypothesis, we can state that there is a no statistically significant difference in the average ratings among four tourist places. Therefore, all are same.