Infrastructure of ITM classroom
Dhiren Subudhi, Tirth Jain , Yash Chopra , Vineet Dingoliya
- F3 2024-26 – 021330024135, ITM Business School, Kharghar, Maharashtra, India
- F3 2024-26 – 021330024428, ITM Business School, Kharghar, Maharashtra, India
- F3 2024-26 – 021330124052, ITM Business School, Kharghar, Maharashtra, India
- F3 2024-26 – 021330424038, ITM Business School, Kharghar, Maharashtra, India
* Corresponding Author E-mail: 2024.dhirens@isu.ac.in
Introduction: The classroom environment plays a critical role in enhancing the learning experience for students. A well-maintained, comfortable, and fully equipped classroom not only supports effective teaching but also ensures students remain engaged and focused. However, during a recent lecture in the ITM classroom, several issues were observed that hindered the overall learning experience, such as the air conditioning malfunction, missing teaching tools, and poor visibility of the whiteboard.
Objective: To understand the Infrastructure of ITM classroom
Literature Review:
According to Jason Vaden (2007), “Classroom technologies are revitalizing teaching and learning in universities across the nation. Due to the heightened use of classroom technologies, it is vital that administrators have some tool to evaluate existing programs.”
According to Mike Tissenbaum & James D. Slotta (2019) , “K-12 classroom settings are not yet incorporating emerging technologies such as ubiquitous computing, augmented reality, nor even touch surfaces, despite the significant impact that such media have made in many other aspects of our lives.”
Data Collection: Following questions were framed on liked scale with the help of google forms.
Q1. I saw ac wasn’t working.
Q2. I saw dusters and markers were missing .
Q3. I saw classroom looked appealing.
Q4. We can’t see white board clearly.
Q5. We felt humid during the lecture.
For every question, mean, standard error, and Z value was calculated.
Data Analysis:
|
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q5 |
|
Mean |
2.64462 |
3.01652 |
3.32231 |
3.066115 |
3.12396 |
|
Standard Error |
1.47116 |
1.43168 |
1.36146 |
1.37073 |
1.55225 |
|
Standard Deviation |
0.13374 |
0.13015 |
0.12376 |
0.12461 |
0.14111 |
|
Z- Value |
-0.24155 |
0.01154 |
0.23674 |
0.04823 |
0.07986 |
|
Result |
Disagree |
Neutral |
Agree |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Conclusion:
1)Fixing the AC will ensure a comfortable classroom.
2)Improving whiteboard visibility enhances learning.
3)Providing dusters and markers supports effective teaching.
4)A tidy classroom boosts student focus.
5)Addressing issues improves overall classroom efficiency.
References:
Jason Vaden (2007).
A Model Assessment Tool for Classroom Technology Infrastructure in Higher Education.
Mike Tissenbaum & James D. Slotta (2019).
Devloping a smart classroom infrastructure to support real-time student collaboration and enquiry: A 4 year design study
