A Comparative Statistical Analysis of Sweet Preferences

A Comparative Statistical Analysis of Sweet Preferences

Author: Poonam Dwivedi (61)

Introduction:

Food preferences play an important role in consumer behavior and cultural studies. Traditional Indian sweets such as Kajukatli, Gulabjamun, Rasmalai, and Laddu are widely consumed and appreciated across regions. However, individual preferences may vary based on taste, texture, and personal liking. Statistical analysis helps in identifying whether these differences in ratings are significant or simply due to random variation.

This study evaluates the ratings of selected sweets to understand differences in consumer preferences.

Objective:

To analyze the ratings of four sweets using One-Way ANOVA in order to determine whether significant differences exist among them.

Literature Review:

Consumer Preference and Food Choice Behavior

Previous studies suggest that food preferences are influenced by sensory attributes such as taste, texture, and appearance. Researchers highlight that traditional sweets often receive varied ratings due to cultural familiarity and individual taste differences.

Application of Statistical Techniques in Food Studies

Studies in food science emphasize the use of statistical tools like ANOVA to compare multiple food items simultaneously. It allows researchers to determine whether observed differences in ratings are statistically significant, rather than due to chance.

Data Collection:

The data was collected through a Google Form survey.
A total of 30 responses were recorded. Participants rated four sweets—Kajukatli, Gulabjamun, Rasmalai, and Laddu—on a scale of 1 to 10.

Data Analysis:

Summary

SUMMARY

         

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

   

Kajukatli

30

283

9.433333

1.288506

   

Gulabjamun

30

252

8.4

3.282759

   

Rasmalai

30

263

8.766667

2.185057

   

Laddu

30

201

6.7

5.182759

   
             
             

ANOVA

           

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

122.0917

3

40.69722

13.63496

1.11E-07

2.682809

Within Groups

346.2333

116

2.98477

     
             

Total

468.325

119

 

 

 

 

             

Hypotheses

  • H₀: Kajukatli = Gulabjamun = Rasmalai = Laddu 

  • H₁: At least one sweet has a different mean rating 

Conclusion:

As calculated, F (13.63) > F crit (2.68)
and p-value (1.11 × 10⁻⁷ < 0.05)

 Therefore, we reject H₀ and accept H₁

This indicates that there is a significant difference in the average ratings of the sweets.

  • Kajukatli is most preferred (Mean = 9.43) 

  • Laddu is least preferred (Mean = 6.70) 

References:

  • Singh, S. (2011). Consumer preference and performance analysis. 

  • Kumar, P., & Nagorao, C. G. (2022). Statistical modeling techniques in comparative studies. 

Leave a comment