Title: EXPERIENCE OF STUDENTS IN ACCOMODATING IN PG
Author: Deepali Jain, Prakhar Kankane, Rohit Kailas Patil
Introduction: By delving into the lived experiences of individuals residing in PGs, this research seeks to provide valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities associated with PG living in Mumbai, addressing the nuances that contribute to the overall quality of life for its residents. Through a comprehensive examination of these aspects, we aim to identify areas of improvement and recommend potential solutions to enhance the overall PG living experience in Mumbai.
Objective: To understand the underlying phenomenon of living experiences in PGs in Mumbai
Literature Review/ Views and Reviews:
“Paying guests find ‘work from home’ a struggle.” (The Hindu)
This article talks about lack of access to essential equipment like computers or reliable internet hampers their ability to complete work tasks efficiently. Overcrowded rooms in shared accommodations make finding a dedicated workspace with minimal distractions difficult, affecting focus and productivity.
“Why Living in PGs in Mumbai can be the worst decision ever.”
Cramped quarters, bland food, and zero privacy – Mumbai’s PGs are anything but homes. Shared Wi-Fi, bathrooms, and even water struggle to serve 50+ residents. Forget inviting friends, even swallowing the mediocre (at best) food is a test of endurance. Opt for shelter elsewhere, this “home” will just leave you feeling out of place and out of pocket.
Data Collection: For the given problem five questions were framed on Likert scale.
We have decided to investigate the statements by means of an online survey where we collected survey from 104 students of ITM.
For every question, the mean, standard deviation, standard error, and t-stat were calculated. This data was primarily collected by us.
Data analysis:
H0: µ=3
H1: µ≠3
|
|
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Standard Error |
T- Stat |
Result |
|
Question 1 |
3.19 |
1.10 |
0.11 |
1.73 |
H0 |
|
Question 2 |
3.19 |
1.05 |
0.11 |
1.81 |
H0 |
|
Question 3 |
2.98 |
1.06 |
0.11 |
-0.19 |
H0 |
|
Question 4 |
3.1 |
1.10 |
0.11 |
0.91 |
H0 |
|
Question 5 |
3.6 |
0.96 |
0.10 |
6.22 |
H0 |
Conclusion:
Ques 1- The overall cleanliness and hygiene of the PG accommodation meet my expectations.
Result- For question 1 accept the alternative hypothesis as t-stat = 1.73 which is more than 1.96. t-statistic provided is 1.73, it falls within the range of -1.96 to 1.96, we conclude that people are neutral regarding the alternative hypothesis. people are neutral regarding the cleanliness and hygiene of the PG accommodation. There’s no strong positive or negative sentiment indicated by the data.
Ques 2- The essential amenities in the PG accommodation are readily available and function well.
Result- – For question 2 accept the alternative hypothesis as t-stat = 1.81 which is more than 1.96. Since the t statistics is between -1.96 and 1.96, people are neutral regarding the availability and functionality of essential amenities in the PG accommodation. There’s no strong positive or negative sentiment indicated by the data.
Ques 3- The overall value for money in my paying guest accommodation is in line with my expectations.
Result- For question 3 accept the alternative hypothesis as t-stat = -0.19 Since the t statistics is between -1.96 and 1.96, people are neutral regarding the value for money in the paying guest accommodation. There’s no strong positive or negative sentiment indicated by the data.
Ques 4- In my experience, the Paying Guest accommodations (PGs) in Mumbai often feel congested, and I frequently experience feelings of claustrophobia.
Result- For question 4 accept the alternative hypothesis as t-stat = 0.91 which is more than 1.96 Since the t statistic falls between -1.96 and 1.96, people are neutral regarding the feeling of congestion and claustrophobia in the PG accommodations. There’s no strong positive or negative sentiment indicated by the data.
Ques 5- I have positive relations with fellow paying guests, contributing to a supportive living environment.
Result- For question 5 accept the alternative hypothesis as t-stat = 6.22 Since the t statistic is between -1.96 and 1.96, people are considered neutral regarding their positive relations with fellow paying guests, contributing to a supportive living environment. There’s no strong positive or negative sentiment indicated by the data.
References:
Paying guests find ‘work from home’ a struggle – The Hindu
Why Living in PGs in Mumbai can be the worst decision ever – Yoursnews