Title: One Way ANOVA calculation of 4 Mobile Companies.
Author: Piyush Raju Vishwakarma, MMS, Batch B, Roll No. 126
Introduction:
In this analysis 4 mobile companies have been taken, namely:
- Samsung
Samsung is a renowned global leader in the mobile industry, known for its innovative smartphones that blend cutting-edge technology with sleek design. With a rich history of producing high-quality devices, Samsung mobiles cater to a wide range of consumer preferences and offer a diverse lineup of features and capabilities to meet various needs.
- Oppo
Oppo is a prominent player in the mobile industry, celebrated for its stylish and feature-packed smartphones. This Chinese tech company has gained recognition for its commitment to camera innovation, sleek designs, and user-friendly interfaces, making Oppo devices a popular choice for consumers seeking advanced mobile experiences.
- Vivo
Vivo is a well-regarded mobile manufacturer known for its focus on cutting-edge technology and stylish smartphone designs. Hailing from China, Vivo has carved a niche in the market with its commitment to camera advancements, robust performance, and user-centric features, offering a wide range of devices that cater to diverse consumer preferences.
- One plus
OnePlus is a renowned smartphone manufacturer recognized for its commitment to delivering premium Android devices with a strong emphasis on speed, performance, and a clean user experience. Originating from China, OnePlus has garnered a dedicated global fan base through its “Never Settle” philosophy, offering high-quality flagship smartphones that often push the boundaries of technology, making them a favored choice among tech enthusiasts.
Objective: To compare 4 mobile companies by the way of One way ANOVA.
Data Collection: Students of our batch were requested to grade the following mobile companies on the scale of 1-10 and One way ANOVA was calculated.
Data Analysis:
Hypothesis:
H0: All mobile companies are equal (A=B=C=D)
H1: Any one of mobile company is different.
|
Source of Variation |
SS |
DF |
MS |
F |
|
Between Groups |
37.5 |
3 |
12.5 |
|
|
Within Groups |
425.3 |
76 |
5.596053 |
|
|
Total |
462.8 |
79 |
|
2.233717 |
Result: Table F=0.05, 3 DF, 76 DF = 2.719
As calculated F = 2.233 is less than tabulated F = 2.719, accept H0, reject H1, which means all mobile companies are equal.