Racism
Author Ashwin Kambli
BATCH A – 0222022
Integrating Racism as a Sentinel Indicator in Public Health Surveillance and Monitoring Systems.
Integrating racism as a sentinel indicator in public health surveillance and monitoring systems is a concept that involves recognizing racism as a fundamental determinant of health and incorporating it into data collection and analysis processes. This approach aims to understand how racism affects health outcomes and to address health disparities resulting from racial discrimination.
Racism can have significant impacts on individual and population health. It can lead to limited access to quality healthcare, higher rates of chronic stress, mental health issues, and increased exposure to environmental hazards. By integrating racism as a sentinel indicator, public health systems can gather data on racial disparities in health outcomes, access to healthcare, social determinants of health, and exposure to discrimination.
Health Equity Research: A Clarion Call to Focus on Racism, Not Race.
Health equity research is a critical field that aims to understand and address disparities in health outcomes among different populations. In recent years, there has been a growing recognition that focusing solely on race without considering the underlying social determinants, particularly racism, may limit our understanding of health disparities and hinder effective interventions.
The call to focus on racism rather than race in health equity research highlights the importance of examining the structural and systemic factors that contribute to health inequities. While race is a social construct with no inherent biological basis, it is important to recognize that racism, which encompasses discriminatory practices, policies, and beliefs, has tangible and detrimental effects on health.
By shifting the focus to racism, health equity research can delve into understanding how social, economic, and political factors perpetuate health disparities. Racism operates at individual, interpersonal, institutional, and structural levels, shaping access to resources, opportunities, and power. This can result in differential exposure to health risks, limited access to quality healthcare, and unequal distribution of social determinants of health.
Focusing on racism in health equity research allows for a more comprehensive understanding of the root causes of health disparities. It enables researchers to examine how racism intersects with other forms of discrimination, such as sexism, classism, and ableism, to compound health inequities among marginalized populations.
The Impact of Racism, Class, and Criminal Justice on Women’s Distress and Health: A Reinforcing Cycle of Social Disadvantage.
The impact of racism, class, and the criminal justice system on women’s distress and health is a complex issue that highlights the intersecting forms of social disadvantage faced by marginalized women. These factors can create a reinforcing cycle that exacerbates health disparities and contributes to overall distress and well-being.
Racism, as a form of systemic discrimination, plays a significant role in shaping the experiences of women from racial and ethnic minority groups. It can lead to limited access to quality healthcare, economic opportunities, educational resources, and safe housing. The chronic stress resulting from experiences of racism can contribute to mental health issues, such as anxiety and depression, as well as physical health problems.
Class also intersects with racism, as women from low-income backgrounds face additional challenges in accessing resources and opportunities. Poverty and socioeconomic disadvantage can restrict access to healthcare services, healthy food, and safe environments. Limited economic resources may also prevent women from seeking timely medical care or engaging in preventive health behaviors. These factors can contribute to poorer health outcomes and increased distress.
The criminal justice system also plays a significant role in shaping women’s distress and health, particularly for those from marginalized communities. Women, especially women of color, may face racial profiling, harsh sentencing, and over-policing, leading to a disproportionate number of women being incarcerated. The experience of incarceration can have profound impacts on mental health, physical health, and overall well-being. It disrupts social support networks, limits access to healthcare, and perpetuates cycles of disadvantage upon release.
These intersecting factors create a reinforcing cycle of social disadvantage, where racism, class, and involvement with the criminal justice system contribute to poor health outcomes and increased distress among marginalized women. The impacts are cumulative, with each factor amplifying the effects of the others.
Addressing these issues requires comprehensive and intersectional approaches. Efforts should focus on:
Recognizing and addressing systemic racism, including in healthcare, education, employment, and criminal justice systems.
Promoting economic equity by addressing income inequality, providing job training and employment opportunities, and ensuring access to affordable housing.
Reforming the criminal justice system to reduce racial disparities, promote alternatives to incarceration, and provide support services for women who have been incarcerated.
Implementing trauma-informed and culturally sensitive healthcare services that address the unique needs and experiences of marginalized women.
Enhancing social support systems and community resources to provide networks of care, empowerment, and assistance.
By addressing the underlying structural factors that contribute to the reinforcing cycle of social disadvantage, it is possible to promote women’s health, well-being, and resilience. Such efforts require collaborative action from policymakers, healthcare providers, community organizations.
Racial Oppression and Racial Projects in Consumer Markets: A Racial Formation Theory Approach.
Racial oppression and racial projects in consumer markets are complex phenomena that can be analyzed through the lens of racial formation theory. This theory, developed by sociologists Michael Omi and Howard Winant, explores how race is socially constructed and how it shapes various aspects of society, including consumer markets.
According to racial formation theory, race is not a fixed, biological category but a social construct that is continuously created and reinforced through social and institutional practices. Racial categories and hierarchies are not natural or innate but are shaped by historical, political, economic, and cultural forces.
In consumer markets, racial oppression refers to the systematic discrimination and disadvantage experienced by racialized groups in accessing and participating in the marketplace. This oppression can manifest in various ways, such as limited access to quality products and services, discriminatory pricing, racial profiling in retail spaces, and exclusion from certain market segments.
Racial projects in consumer markets refer to the deliberate efforts by individuals, institutions, and corporations to shape and manipulate racial dynamics for their own interests. These projects can involve marketing strategies that exploit racial stereotypes or reinforce racial hierarchies. For example, advertising campaigns that depict racialized individuals in stereotypical or demeaning ways can reinforce negative racial attitudes and perpetuate discriminatory practices.
Additionally, racial projects can be seen in the ways products and services are marketed and targeted to specific racial or ethnic groups. This can involve cultural appropriation, where elements of marginalized cultures are commodified and marketed to broader audiences without giving proper recognition or compensation to the originating culture. It can also involve the creation of niche markets that cater to specific racial or ethnic groups, which can simultaneously reinforce stereotypes and limit opportunities for genuine inclusion and equal access.
Racial formation theory helps us understand that racial oppression and racial projects in consumer markets are not isolated incidents but are deeply rooted in historical and ongoing systems of power, privilege, and inequality. By critically examining these dynamics, we can work towards challenging and dismantling racial hierarchies and creating more equitable and inclusive consumer markets. This requires addressing systemic issues, promoting diversity and representation, and ensuring equal opportunities for all individuals regardless of their race or ethnicity
Assessing worry, racism, and belief in a just world
that assess the extent to which individuals endorse a just world view. Assessing worry, racism, and belief in a just world requires a comprehensive understanding of each concept and the various ways they can be measured. Here’s an overview of each concept and some common methods used for assessment:
Worry:
Worry refers to a state of distress or unease caused by concerns about potential future events or outcomes. Assessing worry often involves self-report measures that capture the frequency, intensity, and specific content of worries. These measures can include questionnaires, Likert scales, or interviews that ask individuals to rate or describe their worries across different domains such as health, relationships, finances, or work-related issues. Examples of commonly used scales include the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) and the Worry Domains Questionnaire (WDQ).
Racism:
Racism involves prejudiced attitudes, discriminatory behaviors, or systemic practices that result in unequal treatment or disadvantage based on a person’s race or ethnicity. Assessing racism can be challenging as it involves capturing individuals’ beliefs, attitudes, and behaviors. Various approaches can be used, including self-report measures, implicit measures, and observational methods. Self-report measures typically rely on participants’ self-disclosure and may involve questionnaires or surveys that assess explicit racial attitudes and beliefs. Examples of widely used scales include the Implicit Association Test (IAT) and the Modern Racism Scale.
Belief in a just world:
Belief in a just world refers to the cognitive tendency to believe that people generally get what they deserve and that the world is inherently fair. Assessing belief in a just world often involves self-report measures that capture individuals’ agreement or disagreement with statements related to justice, fairness, and deservingness. Several scales have been developed to measure this construct, such as the Just World Scale (JWS) and the Belief in a Just World Scale (BJW). These scales typically consist of Likert-type items
Mechanisms Connecting Police Brutality, Intersectionality, and Women’s Health Over the Life Course.
The mechanisms connecting police brutality, intersectionality, and women’s health over the life course are complex and multifaceted. Here are some key points to consider:
Intersectionality: Intersectionality is a concept that recognizes how various forms of social identity, such as race, gender, class, and sexuality, intersect and interact to shape an individual’s experiences and outcomes. Women who experience police brutality may have multiple intersecting identities that contribute to their vulnerability and the specific nature of their experiences.
Police Brutality: Police brutality refers to the excessive or unnecessary use of force by law enforcement officers. It can manifest in various forms, including physical violence, verbal abuse, sexual assault, and harassment. Women, particularly those from marginalized communities, often face unique forms of police violence that intersect with their gender, race, and other identities.
Women’s Health: Police brutality can have significant implications for women’s health over the life course. Physical injuries resulting from excessive force can have immediate health consequences, ranging from bruises and fractures to more severe injuries and even death. Additionally, the traumatic experiences associated with police violence can lead to long-term mental health issues, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, and depression.
Reproductive Health: Police brutality can also impact women’s reproductive health. Incidents of sexual assault or harassment by law enforcement officers can cause physical and psychological trauma, affecting a woman’s sexual and reproductive well-being. Furthermore, the stress and trauma associated with police violence can disrupt menstrual cycles, contribute to infertility, and increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.
Access to Healthcare: Women who experience police brutality may face barriers in accessing healthcare services. Fear of retaliation, financial constraints, lack of trust in the healthcare system, and limited awareness of available resources can prevent women from seeking timely medical attention and support. This can lead to delayed or inadequate treatment, exacerbating the health consequences of police violence.
Intergenerational Effects: The impact of police brutality on women’s health can extend beyond the individual and affect future generations. Maternal stress and trauma resulting from police violence can have intergenerational implications, influencing the health and well-being of children and even grandchildren. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) associated with police brutality can contribute to a range of health issues in offspring, including increased risks of chronic diseases and mental health disorders.
Systemic Oppression: The mechanisms connecting police brutality, intersectionality, and women’s health are rooted in systemic oppression. Structural racism, sexism, and other forms of discrimination shape law enforcement practices and policies, disproportionately impacting marginalized communities. Addressing these structural inequalities and advocating for police reform is crucial to improving the health outcomes of women across intersecting identities.
Selling whiteness? – A critical review of the literature on marketing and racism.
This critical review examines the literature on marketing and racism, with a specific focus on the concept of “selling whiteness.” It explores the ways in which marketing strategies have historically reinforced racial hierarchies and perpetuated systemic racism. By analyzing scholarly articles, books, and relevant research, this paper aims to shed light on the ways in which marketing practices have both reflected and contributed to the marginalization of non-white individuals. Furthermore, it critically examines the implications of such marketing strategies and highlights the need for more inclusive and ethical approaches in the field. This critical review aims to contribute to the existing body of knowledge by highlighting the ways in which marketing practices have historically perpetuated racism and upheld racial hierarchies. By critically examining the concept of “selling whiteness” and its implications, it calls for a more inclusive and socially responsible approach in marketing that promotes diversity, challenges stereotypes, and supports equality. By acknowledging and addressing these issues, the marketing industry can play a significant role in dismantling systemic racism and fostering a more equitable society.
Historical Consciousness, Part II: Responding to Racism, Ecological Threats, and the Fragmentation of Modern Universities.
Responding to Racism:
Racism has deep historical roots, and addressing it requires acknowledging and learning from past injustices while actively working to dismantle systemic racism in the present. Historical consciousness allows us to understand the historical origins of racial inequality, the legacies of colonialism and slavery, and the ongoing effects of discriminatory policies and practices. By examining historical patterns of racial oppression, we can gain insights into the causes and consequences of racism, identify structural inequalities, and foster empathy and solidarity across racial lines.
To respond effectively to racism, individuals, communities, and institutions must engage in critical dialogue, educate themselves about diverse histories and experiences, and promote inclusive policies and practices. This includes supporting efforts to decolonize educational curricula, amplifying marginalized voices and perspectives, and fostering inclusive spaces for dialogue and learning. By cultivating historical consciousness and addressing the historical roots of racism, we can promote social justice and build a more equitable society.
Tackling Ecological Threats:
Ecological threats, such as climate change, deforestation, and biodiversity loss, have profound implications for our planet’s future. Historical consciousness enables us to understand the human-environment relationship over time and the role of past actions in shaping present environmental challenges. By studying historical patterns of resource exploitation, environmental degradation, and human responses to ecological crises, we can gain insights into sustainable practices and develop effective strategies for mitigating environmental threats.
To tackle ecological challenges, it is crucial to promote interdisciplinary collaboration and integrate historical perspectives into environmental studies. By recognizing the long-term consequences of human activities on ecosystems, we can make informed decisions, advocate for conservation and restoration efforts, and develop sustainable policies and practices. Historical consciousness reminds us of the importance of learning from past mistakes and adopting a long-term perspective in our approach to environmental stewardship.
Addressing the Fragmentation of Modern Universities:
The fragmentation of modern universities refers to the growing specialization and disciplinary boundaries that often hinder interdisciplinary collaboration and holistic understanding. Historical consciousness can help counter this fragmentation by highlighting the interconnectedness of knowledge and fostering a broader understanding of complex issues. By engaging with historical perspectives across disciplines, scholars and students can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the social, cultural, and political contexts that shape contemporary challenges.
To address the fragmentation, universities can promote interdisciplinary research, teaching, and collaboration. Encouraging students and faculty to explore different fields of study, integrating diverse perspectives into curriculum design, and facilitating interdisciplinary research projects can help bridge disciplinary divides. Furthermore, universities should foster spaces for dialogue and exchange that encourage critical engagement with historical consciousness, enabling a more holistic understanding of complex issues and nurturing the skills necessary for collaborative problem-solving.
In conclusion, historical consciousness plays a vital role in responding to racism, ecological threats, and the fragmentation of modern universities. By understanding the historical roots of these challenges, we can develop informed and effective strategies to foster social justice, environmental sustainability, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Embracing historical consciousness allows us to learn from the past and shape a more inclusive, equitable, and resilient future.
Diagnosing Racism in Public Health: The Turnkey to Effective Interventions.
To diagnose racism in public health, it is essential to adopt an intersectional lens that considers the various social determinants of health, including race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender, and more. This approach helps identify how racism operates at multiple levels, such as individual, institutional, and structural, and how it influences health outcomes.
Here are some key aspects related to diagnosing racism in public health and implementing effective interventions:
Data collection and analysis: Collecting and analyzing disaggregated data based on race and ethnicity can help identify disparities and understand the impact of racism on health outcomes. This information is crucial for targeting interventions and advocating for policy changes.
Cultural competence: Public health professionals need to develop cultural competence, which involves understanding the historical, social, and political contexts that contribute to racism and health disparities. This knowledge helps inform interventions that are sensitive and tailored to specific communities.
Anti-racist policies and practices: Public health organizations and institutions should actively work towards implementing anti-racist policies and practices. This includes addressing biases within healthcare systems, diversifying the healthcare workforce, promoting inclusive decision-making processes, and ensuring equitable resource allocation.
Community engagement and empowerment: Engaging and empowering communities affected by racism is crucial for designing effective interventions. Collaboration with community organizations, leaders, and individuals can help identify specific needs, co-create solutions, and ensure interventions are culturally appropriate and sustainable.
Education and awareness: Promoting education and awareness about racism’s impact on health is essential. This involves training public health professionals on implicit bias, structural racism, and health disparities. Additionally, raising public awareness through campaigns and initiatives helps create a shared understanding of the issue.
Policy advocacy: Public health professionals have a role in advocating for policies that address racism and health disparities. This includes supporting legislation and initiatives that promote equitable access to healthcare, affordable housing, quality education, and other social determinants of health.
By diagnosing racism in public health and implementing targeted interventions, we can work towards dismantling systemic barriers and achieving health equity for all individuals, regardless of their race or ethnicity.
Can success deflect racism? Clothing and perceptions of African American men.
The relationship between success and racism is complex and multifaceted. While success can certainly challenge stereotypes and misconceptions, it may not necessarily eliminate or “deflect” racism entirely. Racism is a deeply rooted social issue that involves prejudice, discrimination, and systemic biases based on race.
When it comes to perceptions of African American men, clothing choices can unfortunately be influenced by racial stereotypes. Society often perpetuates certain images or expectations associated with different racial groups, including African American men. However, it is important to recognize that individuals should not be judged or treated differently based on their clothing choices or any other external factors.
Success and achievement can certainly challenge stereotypes and break down barriers. When African American men achieve success in various fields, such as business, sports, entertainment, or academia, it can help challenge preconceived notions and provide positive role models for others. Successful individuals can serve as counterexamples to negative stereotypes and contribute to changing perceptions.
Nonetheless, it is important to remember that racism is deeply ingrained in social structures and can persist despite individual success. Racism is a systemic issue that requires collective efforts to address. While success can be empowering and inspiring, it is crucial to continue advocating for equality, combating discrimination, and promoting inclusivity in all aspects of society.
Conclusion:
We have described seven harmful racial discourse practices which, taken as a whole, reinforce the common misconception that racism is simply a problem of rare, isolated, individual attitudes and actions. We argue that racism is a cumulative and compounding product of an array of societal factors that, on balance, systematically privilege white people and disadvantage people of color. We have also offered everyday recommendations for how readers can help overcome these harmful racial discourse practices.
REFERENCES:
WHITE, K.; BEATTY MOODY, D. L.; LAWRENCE, J. A. Integrating Racism as a Sentinel Indicator in Public Health Surveillance and Monitoring Systems. American Journal of Public Health, [s. l.], v. 113, p. S80–S84, 2023. DOI 10.2105/ajph.2022.307160. Disponível em: https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=0bc1da78-cc66-3ae5-a435-df30d4468491. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2023.
WU, E. Health Equity Research: A Clarion Call to Focus on Racism, Not Race. American Journal of Public Health, [s. l.], v. 113, n. 6, p. 604–606, 2023. Disponível em: https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=15c62334-831f-30a3-93e4-2cf5bce9bf82. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2023.
JONES, A. A.; SANTOS-LOZADA, A. R. The Impact of Racism, Class, and Criminal Justice on Women’s Distress and Health: A Reinforcing Cycle of Social Disadvantage. American Journal of Public Health, [s. l.], v. 113, p. S13–S15, 2023. DOI 10.2105/ajph.2022.307149. Disponível em: https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=58672811-3217-394a-98ce-a208cade3464. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2023
CROCKETT, D. Racial Oppression and Racial Projects in Consumer Markets: A Racial Formation Theory Approach. Journal of Consumer Research, [s. l.], v. 49, n. 1, p. 1–24, 2022. DOI 10.1093/jcr/ucab050. Disponível em: https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=2797eb22-5415-3764-ae3b-278d42638e97. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2023.
LITAM, S. D. A.; BALKIN, R.; HENDRICKS, L. Assessing worry, racism, and belief in a just world. Journal of Counseling & Development, [s. l.], v. 100, n. 1, p. 75–83, 2022. DOI 10.1002/jcad.12404. Disponível em: https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=127fdcdd-556b-3574-82e7-0e27b7f777b3. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2023.
ALANG, S. et al. Mechanisms Connecting Police Brutality, Intersectionality, and Women’s Health Over the Life Course. American Journal of Public Health, [s. l.], v. 113, p. S29–S36, 2023. DOI 10.2105/ajph.2022.307064. Disponível em: https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=4ad771e5-a1e5-34fc-a562-5c19b8a87624. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2023.
Historical Consciousness, Part II: Responding to Racism, Ecological Threats, and the Fragmentation of Modern Universities. American Journal of Economics & Sociology, [s. l.], v. 80, n. 5, p. 1455–1473, 2021. DOI 10.1111/ajes.12433. Disponível em: https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=5dba2123-6d46-3704-8c01-00a76b44ad2a. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2023.
SALVADOR, R. J. Diagnosing Racism in Public Health: The Turnkey to Effective Interventions. American Journal of Public Health, [s. l.], v. 112, p. S785–S786, 2022. DOI 10.2105/ajph.2022.307085. Disponível em: https://discovery.ebsco.com/linkprocessor/plink?id=ac1027aa-a11b-36fa-98e8-c0492254ec99. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2023.