Shoppers Stop Ltd. v. Vinod’s Shoppers Stop

SHOPPERS STOP LTD. V. VINOD’S SHOPPERS STOP CASE NO: CS (OS) 1954/2015 ATTORNEY(S): Mr. Ankit Rustogi (Advocate), Mr. Jayant Kumar (Advocate) JUDGES: Hima Kohli, J. CASE LAW: A Plaintiff is a person who brings a case against another in the court of law. In this case, the Plaintiff was the proprietor of the mark ‘SHOPPERS… Continue reading Shoppers Stop Ltd. v. Vinod’s Shoppers Stop

The Airborne Company Lawsuit

Airborne, the herbal supplement company that once called itself a “miracle cold buster,” was asked pay $23.3 million to settle a class action lawsuit over false advertising, according to published reports. Legal battles beginning in 2006 was called in to question the product’s claims to be able to stop the common cold. A February 2006… Continue reading The Airborne Company Lawsuit

CASE STUDY – “ADANI GROUP WINS CASE OVER TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT”

Trademark infringement is described because the unauthorized use of an indicator or carrier mark. This use may be in reference to items or offerings and can cause confusion, deception, or a false impression approximately the real enterprise a service or product got here from. Trademark proprietors can take criminal motion in the event that they… Continue reading CASE STUDY – “ADANI GROUP WINS CASE OVER TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT”

Tata Sons Vs Cyrus Mistry

INTRODUCTION Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is a Tata Sons division that was established on April 1,1968. It is a global Indian information technology (IT) services and consulting firm located in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Cyrus Mistry is an Indian businessman. He was the Chairman of the massive Tata Group business from 2012 until 2016. He also… Continue reading Tata Sons Vs Cyrus Mistry

State Bank of India vs Metenere Ltd.

Name: Srushti Mokal Roll No: M2149 State Bank of India vs Metenere Ltd. Introduction: The case is concerning a vital issue on the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 What is Interim Resolution Professional: appointment, qualifications, and disqualification? To be eligible for appointment, the IRP/RP must be independent… Continue reading State Bank of India vs Metenere Ltd.

Case study on Parle Product v/s Udaan

Udaan, a business-to-business e-commerce startup, has filed a grievance with the Competition Commission of India (CCI). Against India’ largest biscuit maker, Parle Products. In its complaint, Udaan claims that Parle may be abusing its dominant position by refusing to provide its fast-moving merchandise on to the Bengaluru-based company for no reason. Parle is a dominant… Continue reading Case study on Parle Product v/s Udaan

Case Study on Amazon vs Future Retail

Overview. Amazon is an online technology company with headquarters in the United States that focuses on artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and digital streaming. It has been called “one of the most significant economic and cultural forces in the globe”. Future Retail runs some of the most well-known retail chains in India. These stores inspire trust… Continue reading Case Study on Amazon vs Future Retail

Dabur India Ltd.: -A Case Study

In this case, Emami Ltd. had created an advertisement and TVC promoting its sugar free variant of chyawanprash. Aggrieved by the same, Dabur India Ltd., filed a suit against publication of these advertisements which it felt was meant to disparage “chyawanprash”. Then Emami modified its advertisement in accordance with the appellate Court’s judgment and submitted… Continue reading Dabur India Ltd.: -A Case Study

CASE STUDY – “ADANI GROUP WINS CASE OVER TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT”

Trademark infringement is described because the unauthorized use of an indicator or carrier mark. This use may be in reference to items or offerings and can cause confusion, deception, or a false impression approximately the real enterprise a service or product got here from. Trademark proprietors can take criminal motion in the event that they… Continue reading CASE STUDY – “ADANI GROUP WINS CASE OVER TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT”