Title: Deforestation
Author: Yuvraj Harish Koli
Literature Review
Deforestation shows that cutting down forests affects the environment, people’s health, and the economy in many ways. Research from Mexico explains that forest loss can harm newborn babies by causing lower birth weight and health problems, mainly because of higher temperatures and more air pollution. In the Brazilian Amazon, forests are mainly cut down for cattle farming and soybean production, especially with the use of heavy machines.
For example, in Nepal, the 2015 earthquake led people to clear more forests to create farmland and earn income. In Brazil’s Caatinga region, deforestation may improve income for a short time, heavy forest loss does not bring long-term development benefits. Forests may suffer in the early stages of economic growth but improved as the country becomes more developed. Deforestation is a complex problem that affects health, the environment, and development, and it needs strong policies, cooperation, and sustainable practices to solve it.
Deforestation and Newborn Health in Mexico
It explains how cutting down forests affects babies’ health in Mexico. By using birth records from 2011 to 2021 and satellite data, Deforestation increases babies are born with lower weight and have a higher risk of health problems at birth, such as low birth weight and low Apgar scores. It suggests that higher temperatures and more air pollution caused by deforestation may be the reasons behind these health issues.
Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
It explains why forests are being cut down in the Amazon rainforest between 2008 and 2019. Farming activities, especially increasing pasture land for cattle and growing soybeans, are the main reasons for deforestation. The use of heavy machines like crawler tractors increases forest destruction, while smaller machines like wheeled tractors may slightly reduce it and the areas with more people actually have less deforestation, possibly because cities and different types of jobs reduce the need to cut forests. It also shows that the areas with the most deforestation have shifted over time. The government should make strict rules for heavy machinery, promote sustainable farming, and improve monitoring to protect the forest while still supporting agriculture.
Impact of Deforestation on Newborn Health in Mexico
By combining national birth records with satellite data on forest loss, higher deforestation is linked to lower baby birth weight, a greater risk of low birth weight, and weaker Apgar scores at birth. In simple terms, babies born in areas with more forest destruction tend to have poorer health at birth. Overall, the environmental damage can directly harm newborn health and highlights the need to protect forests to improve long-term well-being.
Uncertain Deforestation and the Danger of Forest Collapse
It created a model that includes economic, social, and environmental uncertainties and applied it to a case similar to the Brazilian Amazon. The sudden shocks and ongoing pressures can increase the risk of reaching a critical tipping point. It also highlights that with climate change causing more frequent shocks, strict action against illegal logging and better monitoring systems are crucial to protect forests in the long term.
Earthquakes and Deforestation in Nepal
By analyzing satellite information from nearly 4,000 villages- communities located about 30 to 120 kilometers from the earthquake’s center cleared more forests and grasslands to create farmland. The closer the villages were to the epicenter, the greater the increase in cropland, and this effect gradually became smaller with distance. Areas with more agricultural investment expanded farming activities more quickly, as families focused on earning income after the disaster rather than protecting forests. Natural disasters can lead to increased deforestation and suggests that poorer or less-developed areas may need extra help to recover in an environmentally sustainable way.
Deforestation and Development in Brazil’s Caatinga Region
Areas with moderate deforestation showed short-term improvements in income, poverty levels, health, and life expectancy. However, places with very high deforestation did not maintain these benefits over time, and development progress slowed or stopped. By 2010, the advantages seen in heavily deforested areas had mostly disappeared. It simplify that natural resources does not guarantee long-term development, and lasting progress requires better government action, institutional support, and efforts to reduce social inequality.
Economic Growth and Forest Protection in the United States
Economic growth influences forest sustainability in the United States between 1980 and 2022. The Load Capacity Curve for Deforestation using an advanced statistical method to better understand the connection between the economy and forest health and it also show a U-shaped pattern, that the forest conditions may worsen in the early stages of economic growth but improve as the economy becomes more developed. It finds that increased trade helps protect forests, while financial development can harm forest sustainability, and urbanization does not have a strong long-term effect. Overall, economic and financial policies should be carefully designed to support environmental protection and sustainable forest management.
Importance of Equity in REDD+ Programs
A model is used to study how landowners and private investors make decisions when fairness is considered. This benefits are shared more equally, REDD+ programs can work more efficiently and increase overall social welfare, especially if landowners care about fairness or if investors strongly prefer equal distribution. However, being fair does not always improve the actual environmental results and can sometimes reduce effectiveness. Therefore, a careful balance between fairness, efficiency, and effectiveness is necessary to make REDD+ programs sustainable in the long run.
Role of Cooperative Norms in Global Deforestation
The satellite use data on forest cover and cultural indicators created by Geert Hofstede to examine the relationship between cooperation, future-oriented thinking, and deforestation from 2000 to 2016. The countries where people value teamwork and collective responsibility tend to have lower levels of deforestation. However, simply thinking more about the future (long-term orientation) does not show a strong connection with reduced forest loss. Overall, the societies that promote cooperation are more likely to protect their forests, along with the influence of economic and government-related factors.
Deforestation and Forest Recovery in North Korea
The forest cover decrease during Japanese rule, increased slightly after independence, and then decrease again during the Korean War. Forests improved during the socialist development period but sharply declined after the 1990s when Eastern European socialism collapsed. Between 1990 and 2010, about 2.2 million hectares of forest were lost mainly because people cut trees for fuel and used land for farming food crops. To solve problems like international relations, political and institutional changes, improved forest management, and support for local communities, as the forest crisis is connected to larger economic, social, and environmental issues in the country.
Conclusion
Deforestation is not only an environmental issue but also a serious social, economic, and health concern. Forest loss contributes to poor newborn health in countries like Mexico, increases environmental risks in regions such as the Brazilian Amazon, and creates unstable development patterns in areas like Brazil’s Caatinga region. It is driven by agriculture, economic pressures, disasters, weak governance, and cultural factors, as seen in countries including Nepal, United States, and North Korea. While some short-term economic benefits may occur, long-term forest destruction leads to environmental damage, social inequality, and economic instability. Therefore, strong government policies, sustainable agricultural practices, fair benefit-sharing programs like REDD+, and cooperative social values are essential to protect forests and ensure sustainable development for future generations.
Reference
Aida, T. (2021). Cooperative norms and global deforestation. Applied Economics Letters, 28(20), 1728–1731. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1853661
Alencar, L., Parry, L., & Melo, F. (2025). Deforestation and human development in the Brazilian tropical dry forest. Forest Policy & Economics, 178, N.PAG.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103571
Chong, F., Amacher, G. S., & Cobourn, K. (2026). Stochastic deforestation and ecosystem collapse. Resource & Energy Economics, 85, N.PAG.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2025.101549
Garcia-Vara, J., Lopez-Feldman, A., & Marquez-Padilla, F. (2025). The giving tree: impacts of deforestation on birth outcomes in Mexico. Applied Economics Letters, 32(20), 2974–2978. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2358184
Liu, J., & Sheng, C. (2023). A historic review of deforestation and afforestation in North Korea. Third World Quarterly, 44(11), 2391–2403.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2023.2233918
Lunku, H. S., Li, Z., & Yang, S. (2025). Sub-Saharan African Quest for Economic Prosperity and Deforestation: Impact of Tourism on Forest Conversion. Journal of forest Economics, 40(3), 211-235.
https://doi.or/10.1561/112.00000592
Marca, L., & Alvim, A. M. (2025). Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon: an analysis of spatial interactions between economic and demographic factors. Environment, Development & Sustainability, 1–31.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-025-06211-6
Sheng, J., & Zhang, R. (2024). Equity matters for the efficiency and
effectiveness in Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation-plus Environment, Development & Sustainability, 26(6), 14561–14582.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03206-z
Uzar, U., & Eyuboglu, K. (2025). Testing the load capacity curve for
deforestation: A critical investigation using novel methods for the United States. Forest Policy & Economics, 178, N.PAG.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103579
Yan, Y., & Paudel, J. (2025). Natural Disasters and Land Use Dynamics: Evidence from Earthquake-Induced Deforestation. World Development, 196, N.PAG.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2025.107156
`