Title: Gender Inequality Across Social and Economic Sectors: A Review of Global Research
Author: Shruti Sudhir Dakhinkar
Roll no.: 59
1.0. Introduction
Gender inequality is a major social and economic issue that affects many areas of life, including education, employment, healthcare, politics, and family relationships. It refers to unequal opportunities, treatment, or outcomes experienced by individuals because of their gender. Researchers across the world study gender inequality to understand its causes, its impact on society, and ways to reduce it.
The following document presents detailed summaries of ten research articles related to gender inequality in different countries and sectors. These studies highlight how gender inequality influences economic growth, education systems, health outcomes, political participation, employment opportunities, and child development. Understanding these research findings helps us recognize the importance of promoting gender equality for building a fair, inclusive, and developed society.
2.0. Objective
• To understand the concept of gender inequality in different countries and sectors.
• To study how gender inequality affects economic growth, education, health, and employment.
• To analyse research findings related to social and cultural factors influencing inequality.
• To identify possible solutions and policy suggestions to reduce gender inequality.
• To develop awareness about the importance of gender equality in society.
3.0. Literature Review
The literature review explains what other researchers have already studied about gender inequality. Different studies show that gender inequality exists in many parts of the world and affects areas like education, jobs, healthcare, politics, and family life. Researchers have found that women often face fewer opportunities compared to men because of social traditions, economic conditions, and cultural beliefs. Many studies also show that gender inequality can slow down a country’s economic growth and reduce women’s independence and decision-making power. At the same time, some research suggests that government policies, education, and social awareness programs can help reduce these inequalities. Overall, past research clearly shows that gender equality is important not only for women but also for the progress and development of the whole society.
3.1. Gender Inequality Research Around the World
This article studies how gender economic inequality is researched in different parts of the world, especially comparing developed countries with Serbia. The researchers examined international academic journals as well as Serbian journals to understand what topics are being studied, who is producing research, and which countries contribute the most knowledge in this area.
The findings show that most research on gender inequality comes from developed regions like Europe and North America. This means that knowledge is not equally produced across the world, and many developing or semi-developed countries are less represented in research publications. In sociology journals, especially those focused on Western countries, researchers often discuss gender roles, identities, and cultural expectations rather than directly studying economic inequality.
In Serbia, research on gender inequality exists but is less visible in national journals. This may create the impression that little research is happening, even when studies are being done. The article suggests that future research should include more diverse countries and examine whether theories developed in Western countries can be applied globally. It also encourages greater recognition of research from less dominant regions to create a more balanced understanding of gender inequality.
3.2. Gender Equality and Economic Growth
This study explains how gender equality, scientific research, and healthcare improvements affect economic growth. It shows that countries with less gender inequality usually perform better economically.
The research also found that population size, scientific development, and good healthcare systems help increase GDP. The main suggestion is that governments should reduce gender inequality and invest in research and healthcare to improve economic development.
3.3. Gender Inequality in Sri Lanka
This article studies gender inequality in Sri Lanka using economic data from 1990 to 2022. It shows that factors like GDP, government spending, unemployment, and financial policies are strongly connected to gender inequality.
The researchers used machine learning models to predict inequality and found GDP to be one of the most important factors. The study suggests policymakers can use this information to reduce gender inequality, but more research is needed to understand cause and effect.
3.4. Gender Inequality in Maternity Care
This article discusses how gender inequality affects maternity care in hospitals. Many pregnant women do not have enough information or power to demand respectful treatment. At the same time, female healthcare workers often face poor working conditions and discrimination.
The article explains that improving healthcare quality alone is not enough. Society must also address gender inequality to reduce mistreatment and prevent maternal deaths.
3.5. Gender Inequality in Higher Education
This study looks at research trends about gender inequality in higher education. It shows that publications on this topic have increased significantly in recent years, especially in the United States and the United Kingdom.
However, women still face barriers in education, especially in less developed regions. The article suggests future research should focus more on women’s real experiences and evaluate policies that promote gender equality in education.
3.6. Gender Inequality and Unemployment
This study analyses global research trends related to gender inequality in higher education. The researchers used data from the Scopus database to examine how many studies have been published, which countries produce the most research, and what topics are commonly discussed.
The findings show a significant increase in research publications after 2017, indicating growing awareness and interest in gender inequality in education. The United States and the United Kingdom lead in research output, which also reflects unequal global participation in academic knowledge production.
Despite increased research attention, women still face barriers in accessing higher education, especially in developing countries and disadvantaged communities. Cultural norms, financial limitations, and institutional discrimination continue to create challenges. The article suggests that future studies should explore women’s personal experiences more deeply and evaluate the effectiveness of policies designed to promote gender equality in education systems.
3.7. Young Women and Political Participation
This study explores how gender, ethnicity, and social background influence political participation among young people in Italy. Family discussions, school environment, and peer groups strongly affect political involvement.
Young women face barriers such as stereotypes, fewer opportunities, and lower confidence compared to men. However, some young people overcome these challenges and become politically active. Schools and inclusive policies can help improve participation.
3.8. Generations and Gender Inequality in Research Institutions
This article examines how different generations perceive gender inequality in medical and dental research institutions in Nigeria. The study found that younger men and women are generally more aware of gender inequality issues, while older women may not always recognize discrimination due to long-term social conditioning.
Older men sometimes support gender equality but may still hold traditional beliefs that reinforce stereotypes. The research suggests that younger generations are more likely to introduce positive changes when they move into leadership roles in the future.
The article emphasizes that addressing gender inequality requires awareness, education, and institutional policies that involve people from all age groups. Understanding generational differences can help organizations create more effective strategies to promote equality.
3.9. Education and Marriage Choices in China
This study looks at women’s marriage choices in China, especially when women marry men with lower education levels. The research shows that this trend is increasing, especially among highly educated women.
Factors like income, family background, and rural or urban location influence marriage decisions. The article explains how social and economic changes are shaping gender roles and relationships.
3.10. Gender Equality in Families and Child Development
This study examines how gender equality within families affects children’s education, mental health, and quality of life in Brazil. Children raised in more equal families tend to perform better academically and have lower risk of depression.
The research shows that strict gender roles harm both boys and girls. Promoting equality at home can improve children’s development, especially in low-income families.
4.0. Conclusion
All ten articles show that gender inequality is a serious issue affecting many areas of life, including the economy, education, healthcare, employment, politics, and family life. The studies clearly indicate that reducing gender inequality leads to better economic growth, improved health, better education outcomes, and stronger societies.
Another important point is that gender inequality does not affect only women; it can also negatively impact men, children, and entire communities. Many studies also highlight that social norms, cultural beliefs, and economic conditions play a major role in creating inequality.
Overall, the research suggests that governments, institutions, and families should work together to promote gender equality. Policies, education, awareness, and equal opportunities are essential to create a fairer and developed society.
5.0. References
- Y. Algül, Discover Sustainability 5, 422 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00663-y
- M. Babović, Sociologija 60, 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1801011B
- M. L. Betron, T. L. McClair, S. Currie, and J. Banerjee, Reproductive Health 15 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0584-6
- W. I. G. Castillo, C. S. Wu, and F. Osei-Kusi, Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies 12 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.70008
- Q. Chang, P. Wu, S. Wang, and M. Zhang, PLoS One 20 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331744
- N. A. Crossley, L. Czepielewski, A. M. B. Menezes, F. Wehrmeister, and C. S. Gama, Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health 13 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2026.10139
- M. O. Foláyan, M. Obiyan, J. Lusher, A. Gascón-Catalán, and G. Z. Martínez-Pérez, Discover Social Science and Health 5, 129 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44155-025-00253-x
- S. Guglielmi, V. Riniolo, N. Maggini, M. Visioli, and A. Sanarico, SocietàMutamentoPolitica 16, 59 (2025). https://doi.org/10.36253/smp-15649
- S. Kularathne, A. Perera, N. Rathnayake, U. Rathnayake, and Y. Hoshino, PLoS One 19 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312395
- V. Valero-Ancco, S. G. Fredy, Y. Lujano-Ortega, and K. M. Calderón-Quino, Educational Process: International Journal 14 (2025). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.14.19