A Comparative Analysis of Consumer Preference among Leading Smartphone Brands Using ANOVA

A Comparative Analysis of Consumer Preference among Leading Smartphone Brands Using ANOVA

Author : Miheer Hegde

Introduction

The global smartphone industry plays a crucial role in modern communication, digital connectivity, and economic growth. Rapid technological advancement, increasing internet penetration, and rising consumer expectations have intensified competition among smartphone brands. Leading manufacturers such as Apple, Samsung, OnePlus, and Vivo compete by offering differentiated features, pricing strategies, design aesthetics, and brand positioning.

Understanding consumer preference among these brands is essential for marketers and manufacturers to strengthen competitive advantage. Statistical tools such as Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) help determine whether observed differences in consumer ratings are statistically significant or occur due to random variation.

 

Objective

The objective of this study is to analyze and compare consumer preference among selected smartphone brands and to determine whether there is a statistically significant difference in their average preference ratings using ANOVA.

 

Literature Review

Literature Review 1

According to Counterpoint Research (2025), statistical methods such as ANOVA are frequently used in consumer electronics research to compare brand perception and customer preference across multiple competitors. Rating-based surveys provide reliable insights when supported by hypothesis testing.

Literature Review 2

Jo and Park (2024) state that smartphone purchase decisions are influenced by brand image, perceived quality, innovation, pricing, and after-sales service. Comparative studies help firms understand consumer loyalty drivers and competitive positioning in saturated markets.

Data Collection

Data Analysis

A Single Factor ANOVA test was applied to examine whether there is a statistically significant difference in the mean ratings of the four smartphone brands.

ANOVA Table

Source of Variation      SSD        DF       MS        F-value        P-value    F critical

Between Groups          40.28        3      13.43          1.57             0.20         2.66 

Within Groups          1335.70     156     8.56 

Total                             1335.70    159

From the ANOVA output:

F value = 1.57

P value = 0.20

F critical = 2.66

 

Since the calculated F value is less than the critical F value and the P value is greater than 0.05, the null hypothesis cannot be rejected. This indicates that there is no statistically significant difference in the average consumer preference ratings of Apple, Samsung, OnePlus, and Vivo.

This suggests that consumer preference among these four smartphone brands is relatively similar, and variations in ratings are likely due to random factors rather than strong brand dominance.

Conclusion

The ANOVA results indicate that there is no significant difference in consumer preference among Apple, Samsung, OnePlus, and Vivo. Hence, all selected smartphone brands are perceived similarly by consumers, and none of the brands shows dominant preference over the others within the scope of this study.

References

Counterpoint Research. (2025). India Smartphone Market Share: Quarterly Analysis Q3 2024 – Q1 2025. Counterpoint Technology Market Research.

Jo, H., & Park, D. H. (2024). Exploring loyalty drivers for smartphone and mobile carriers. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1).

Primary data were collected using a structured questionnaire through an online survey. A total of 40 respondents participated in the study. Respondents were asked to rate four smartphone brands—Apple, Samsung, OnePlus, and Vivo—on a scale of 1 to 10 based on their overall preference. The collected data were analyzed using a Single Factor ANOVA technique.

 

 

Leave a comment