Comparative analysis between 4 Fast-food brands.

Title: Comparative analysis between 4 Fast-food brands.

Author: Durgesh Mishra

Introduction: McDonald’s: McDonald’s is a global fast-food chain famous for its burgers and fries, with over 39,000 locations worldwide. It focuses on speed, convenience, and adapting menus to local tastes.

KFC: KFC, known for its fried chicken and secret recipe, operates over 24,000 outlets globally. The brand emphasizes quality comfort food and a variety of chicken dishes.

Subway: Subway specializes in customizable sandwiches and salads, boasting over 40,000 locations worldwide. The chain promotes fresh ingredients and healthier meal options.

Domino’s: Domino’s is a pizza delivery chain founded in 1960, with over 17,000 stores worldwide. It prioritizes speedy delivery, menu customization, and fresh ingredients.

Objective: Find out whether all Fast-food brands are same or not.

Data Collection: Primary data was collected in a classroom setting, with 20 students participating. The students provided ratings on a scale of 1 to 10. The collected data was subsequently analyzed, and an ANOVA table was generated for further statistical interpretation.

Data Analysis:

Ho: All Fast-food brands are same.

H1: Any one of the Fast-food brand is different.

Anova : Single Factor

           
             

SUMMARY

           

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

   

McDonald’s

20

147

7.35

3.923684211

   

KFC

20

117

5.85

5.292105263

   

Subway

20

117

5.85

5.397368421

   

Domino’s

20

149

7.45

4.155263158

   
             
             

ANOVA

           

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

48.15

3

16.05

3.420639372

0.021412374

2.72494392

Within Groups

356.6

76

4.692105263

     
             

Total

404.75

79

 

 

 

 

 

The above anova table shows the P value which determines whether we accept or reject the null hypothesis and vice versa. The P value for the data collected and analyzed is 0.021, which is less than 0.05 meaning we accept alternate hypothesis.

Conclusion: P value is 0.021 which is less than 0.05 therefore we reject null hypothesis and accept alternate hypothesis, that concludes that any one of the Fast-food brand is different. 

 

 

 

By Durgesh Mishra

student of ITM college want to publish the research.

Leave a comment