Introduction:
Every batsman must master three fundamental skills in cricket: footwork, shot selection, and timing. These skills are the cornerstone of a batsman’s ability to consistently score runs.
Author: Ramjeet Yadav (021330124043), ITM Skills University.
Objective:
To compare the four different Cricketers Skills.
Data collection:
Individual participants provided ratings for Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma, Hardik Pandya, Surya Kumar Yadav. Each rating was collected independently to reflect personal preferences, ensuring fans think about them, this data is being collected from the fans, how much do they support them.
Data analysis:
The ratings were then compiled to analyze Fans preferences using ANOVA: single factor, allowing for statistical evaluation of differences in Cricketers Skills .
The hypothesis for the test are:
- Null Hypothesis (H0): It states that all the Cricketers skills are the same.
- Alternative Hypothesis (H1): It indicate that at least one Cricketer Skills is rated significantly different.
|
Anova: Single Factor |
||||||
|
SUMMARY |
||||||
|
Groups |
Count |
Sum |
Average |
Variance |
||
|
How would you rate Virat Kohli |
20 |
140 |
7 |
10.526 |
||
|
How would you rate Rohit Sharma |
20 |
118 |
5.9 |
10.937 |
||
|
How would you rate Hardik Pandya |
20 |
156 |
7.8 |
6.800 |
||
|
How would you rate Surya Kumar Yadav |
20 |
105 |
5.25 |
8.408 |
||
|
ANOVA |
||||||
|
Source of Variation |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
P-value |
F crit |
|
Between Groups |
77.2375 |
3 |
25.746 |
2.808 |
0.046 |
2.725 |
|
Within Groups |
696.75 |
76 |
9.168 |
|||
|
Total |
773.9875 |
79 |
|
|
|
|
Since the P-value is 0.046 is less than the significance level of 0.05, we accept the Alternative Hypothesis.
Conclusion:
The ANOVA: single factor analysis yielded a P-value less than 0.05, leading to rejecting the Null Hypothesis. This confirms that at least one —Virat Kohli, Rohit Sharma, Hardik Pandya and Suryakumar Yadav—has a significantly different preference level among respondents.