Title of the problem: “Difficulty faced while sitting in canteen to eat”.
|
Authors: |
|
|
Ashwin Kambli |
21 |
|
Amit Singh |
56 |
|
Rutik Thotle |
60 |
Introduction:
The bustling atmosphere of a canteen often provides a much-needed respite from the day’s activities, offering a chance to refuel both physically and mentally. However, this seemingly simple task of sitting down to eat in a canteen can sometimes be accompanied by a variety of unexpected challenges. From crowded spaces to noisy surroundings, these problems can turn a meal into a slightly less enjoyable experience.
Objective:
To understand the underline phenomenon of the problem ‘Problems faced while sitting in canteen to eat’.
Data Collection:
A survey questionnaire was designed with questions related to sitting arrangement for eating food in the college canteen. The Likert scale was used to gather responses from the students, ranging from “Strongly Agree” to “Strongly Disagree.” The questions aimed to assess the students’ experiences of the canteen’s cleanliness and hygiene. A random sample of 100 college students was selected to participate in the survey to ensure a representative representation of the student population.
Data Analysis:
Upon completing the survey, the collected data was subjected to statistical analysis. The mean, standard deviation (SD), and standard error (SE) were calculated for each survey question (Q1–Q5). The mean represents the average response on the Likert scale, while the standard deviation provides a measure of the variability in the responses.
Hypothesis Testing:
To test the hypotheses, a significance level of 0.05 (95% confidence level) was chosen. The critical value for a two-tailed test at a 95% confidence level is Z = 1.96. Z value was calculated based on the mean, standard error.
|
|
Q1 |
Q2 |
Q3 |
Q4 |
Q5 |
|
H0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
H1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
N |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
100 |
|
Mean |
0.66 |
0.2 |
0.88 |
0.08 |
0.13 |
|
SD |
1.41 |
1.32 |
0.90 |
1.47 |
1.24 |
|
SE |
0.14 |
0.13 |
0.09 |
0.15 |
0.12 |
|
Z |
4.69 |
1.52 |
9.76 |
0.54 |
1.04 |
|
Positive/Neutral |
Positive |
Neutral |
Positive |
Neutral |
Neutral |
Confidence Level is taken at 95% i.e. Z=1.96.
Conclusion:
- Overcrowding Consider adjusting your mealtime slightly to avoid the rush. Alternatively, canteen management can implement a reservation system or create additional seating space to accommodate more diners.
- Noise Levels Canteens can introduce noise-absorbing materials, establish designated quiet zones, or regulate background music volume. Diners can also bring noise-cancelling headphones to enjoy a quieter meal.
- Time Constraints Allocate enough time for your meal break, even if it means starting a bit earlier or later. Canteens could offer express meal options or pre-packaged meals for those with tight schedules.
- Cleanliness and Hygiene Canteen staff should ensure regular cleaning routines, promptly clearing tables after diners leave. Diners can also do their part by disposing of waste properly and reporting any cleanliness issues.
- Food Variety and Quality Canteens can offer a diverse range of menu choices, catering to different dietary preferences. Quality can be improved by sourcing fresh ingredients and maintaining a high standard in food preparation.