CCI’S Investigation on FLIPKART

NAME : Mohd. Fahad Khan ROLL. NO. : 26 Company Name : FLIPKART • Introduction : The Competition Commission of India (CCI) announced its investigation in January 2020 after a trader group’s complaint accused FLIPKART for promoting some “preferred sellers” and hurting business for smaller sellers. • About the Competition Act : The primary objective… Continue reading CCI’S Investigation on FLIPKART

New Balance suing Steve Madden

New Balance Athletics Inc, on Tuesday, June 7, 2022, has filed a case against Steve Madden Ltd at the United States District Court, in the District of Massachusetts. New Balance has filed a case claiming Trademark Infringement, unfair competition, and design patent. According to the case filed by New Balance, Steve Madden has replicated the… Continue reading New Balance suing Steve Madden

Samsung Electronics vs Apple Company Legal Analysis Case Study

Key Facts The case was in 2016 which pertains to a patent. In the case, the petitioners were the company of Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.; They petitioned to revise the previous court decision, in which The Apple Inc., won the case. The case is as follows: Apple claimed that Samsung has manufactured many models of… Continue reading Samsung Electronics vs Apple Company Legal Analysis Case Study

INFOSYS

Name – Ivan Rodrigues Subject – Law Roll no – M2114 Case Study INFOSYS  Introduction – Infosys had disclosed that it had received whistleblower complaints alleging certain unethical practices by the top management. US market regulator Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had also investigated the matter. “The complaint, which was filed in the Eastern… Continue reading INFOSYS

Tesla

Name- Thomson Fernandes Subject – Law Roll no – M2153 Case Study Tesla  INTRODUCTIONS – Tesla for “discriminating against its Black workers” after it “received hundreds of complaints from Tesla workers.” and “found evidence that Tesla’s Fremont factory is a racially segregated workplace where Black workers are subjected to racial slurs and discriminated against… Continue reading Tesla

Kotak Mahindra bank case in opposition to Bharat pe founder Ashneer Grover

Name: Kunal Jaggi, Roll No: M2123 Grover sought damages of Rs 500cr in Oct 2021 for a notional loss allegedly suffered due to the financial institution. Kotak says it responded to note, pursuing ‘suitable criminal movement’. A assertion from the Kotak Group stated that the Kotak Mahindra Bank became pursuing “suitable criminal movement” in opposition… Continue reading Kotak Mahindra bank case in opposition to Bharat pe founder Ashneer Grover

Steel Authority of India (SAIL) vs Tata Projects Limited

Name: Saurabh Chaudhari Roll no. M2144 Subject: Business Law STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED (SAIL) vs TATA PROJECTS LIMITED (TPL) The Case On 24-07-2007, the Steel Authority of India ltd (SAIL) issued a tender for the construction of a blast furnace. Two companies are Tata projects limited (TPL) which is an Indian corporation and DC… Continue reading Steel Authority of India (SAIL) vs Tata Projects Limited

Canara Bank vs Mrs.Velangani on 7 July 2022

CHIRAG SHIRSAT M2110 Bangalore District Court Canara Bank vs Mrs.Velangani on 7 July 2022 PLAINTIFF CANARA BANK DEFENDANT MRS.VELANGANI In this case, the defendant approached the bank with a request to sanction a term loan for running her business. She submitted her application to the bank and the application was processed and examined by the… Continue reading Canara Bank vs Mrs.Velangani on 7 July 2022

Siemens Energy vs GE

The case is General Electric Co. v. Siemens Energy Inc., 21-25, U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond). A Siemens Energy AG company was accused by General Electric Co. (GE.N) of utilizing stolen trade secrets to rig contracts for the supply of gas turbines to public utilities and conceal illegal financial profits… Continue reading Siemens Energy vs GE