Comparative analysis between 4 SUVs.

Author: Mubeen Khan

Introduction: 1. Mahindra XUV700

Type: Mid-size SUV

Engine Options: Petrol (2.0L Turbo) and Diesel (2.2L Turbo)

Transmission: Manual and Automatic

Seating Capacity: 5 or 7 seats

Key Features: Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS), panoramic sunroof, dual 10.25-inch touchscreen infotainment and digital cluster, premium interiors.

USP: Known for its feature-rich package, powerful engine options, and advanced safety features.

  1. Tata Harrier

Type: Mid-size SUV

Engine: 2.0L Diesel

Transmission: Manual and Automatic

Seating Capacity: 5 seats

Key Features: Land Rover-derived Omega Arc platform, premium design, panoramic sunroof, large 10.25-inch infotainment screen, terrain response modes.

USP: Renowned for its rugged build, strong road presence, and comfortable ride quality.

  1. Tata Safari

Type: Mid-size 7-seater SUV

Engine: 2.0L Diesel

Transmission: Manual and Automatic

Seating Capacity: 6 or 7 seats

Key Features: Spacious cabin, panoramic sunroof, connected car tech, multi-drive modes, premium interior.

USP: Popular for its spacious 7-seater layout, comfort, and solid build quality.

  1. Hyundai Alcazar

Type: 7-seater SUV

Engine Options: Petrol (2.0L) and Diesel (1.5L)

Transmission: Manual and Automatic

Seating Capacity: 6 or 7 seats

Key Features: Digital instrument cluster, 360-degree camera, panoramic sunroof, ventilated seats, Bose sound system.

USP: Known for its feature-packed cabin, refined engine options, and practicality for family use.

Objective: Find out whether all SUVs are same or not.

Data Collection: Primary data was collected in a classroom setting, with 28 students participating. The students provided ratings on a scale of 1 to 10. The collected data was subsequently analyzed, and an ANOVA table was generated for further statistical interpretation.

Data Analysis:

Ho: All SUVs are same.

H1: Any one of the SUV is different.

Anova: Single Factor

           
             

SUMMARY

           

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

   

xuv

28

256

9.142857

0.719577

   

safari

28

158

5.642857

7.645503

   

harrier

28

165

5.892857

8.395503

   

alcazar

28

167

5.964286

10.25794

   
             
             

ANOVA

           

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

231.6071

3

77.20238

11.42955

0.00

2.688691

Within Groups

729.5

108

6.75463

     
             

Total

961.1071

111

       

Anova: Single Factor

           
             

SUMMARY

           

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

   

xuv

28

256

9.142857

0.719577

   

safari

28

158

5.642857

7.645503

   

harrier

28

165

5.892857

8.395503

   

alcazar

28

167

5.964286

10.25794

   
             
             

ANOVA

           

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

231.6071

3

77.20238

11.42955

0.00

2.688691

Within Groups

729.5

108

6.75463

     
             

Total

961.1071

111

       

 

The above Anova table shows the P value which determines whether we accept or reject the null hypothesis and vice versa. The P value for the data collected and analyzed is 0.00, which is less than 0.5 meaning we accept alternate hypothesis.

Conclusion: P value is 0.00 which is less than 0.05 therefore we reject null hypothesis and accept alternate hypothesis, that concludes that any one of the SUV is different. 

 

 

 

 

 

Leave a comment