Title: Comparison of Four Preferred AI’s : OpenAI’s ChatGPT ,Meta, gemini, copilot
Author: Prajwal Promod Jambhale (021330024157)
Introduction: This report explores the popularity and usage of four prominent AI’s : OpenAI’s ChatGPT ,Meta, gemini, copilot is known for its wide-ranging of knowledge reference materials and guide us about some problems . they help us to save time and help us to collect information Quickly
Objective: To find out all are same or any one of them is different between the preferred AI’s among the participant.
Data Collection: 30 students of ITM Business School were surveyed. They rated these AI’s on a scale of 1 to 10 via a Google Form, with 1 representing the lowest preference and 10 the highest. Following the data collection, the ANOVA: Single Factor test was then performed to compare the means of the ratings across the four AI’s
Data Analysis:
|
ANOVA |
||||||
|
Source of Variation |
SS |
df |
MS |
F |
P-value |
F crit |
|
Between Groups |
58.6 |
3 |
19.53333 |
5.353284 |
0.001729 |
2.682809 |
|
Within Groups |
423.2667 |
116 |
3.648851 |
|||
|
Total |
481.8667 |
119 |
|
|
|
|
The calculated F statistic (5.35) is greater than the critical value of F crit (2.68). This indicates that the variance between group means is significantly greater than the variance within the groups.
P-value:
The P-value (0.001729) is much less than common alpha levels like 0.05 or even 0.01. This suggests strong evidence against the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
- Since the calculated F value is greater than F crit and the P-value is less than 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.
- There is significant evidence to conclude that at least one of the group means is significantly different from the others.