Footballers Choice According to Viewers

Introduction:

Every footballer must master three fundamental skills in the game: ball control, passing accuracy, and positioning. These skills are the cornerstone of a footballer’s ability to contribute effectively to both offensive and defensive plays on the field.

Author: Monarch Shukla (021330124065), ITM Skills University.

Objective:

To compare four different Footballers Choices.

Data collection:

Each participant independently rated Naorem Mahesh Singh, Nandha Kumar Sekar, Lallianzuala Chhangte, and Manvir Singh. These ratings were gathered to reflect individual preferences, ensuring that fans considered their support for each player. The data is being collected to measure the level of fan support for these athletes.

Data analysis:

The ratings were then compiled for analysis of Fans preferences using ANOVA: single factor, allowing for statistical evaluation of differences in footballer fans preferences.

 

The hypothesis for the test are:

Null Hypothesis (H0): It states that all the Footballer’spreference among viewers are same.

Anova: Single Factor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUMMARY

 

 

 

 

 

 

Groups

Count

Sum

Average

Variance

 

 

How would you rate Naorem Mahesh Singh  

25

175

7

10.526

 

 

 How would you rate Nandha Kumar Sekar  

25

148

5.9

10.937

 

 

 How would you rate Lallianzuala Chhangte

25

195

7.8

6.800

 

 

 How would you rate Manvir Singh  

25

131

5.25

8.408

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ANOVA

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source of Variation

SS

df

MS

F

P-value

F crit

Between Groups

78.2375

3

25.746

2.808

0.047

2.725

Within Groups

699.75

76

9.168

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

774.9875

80

 

 

 

 

Alternative Hypothesis (H1): It indicate that at least one Footballer is rated significantly differently.

Since the P-value is 0.047 is less than the significance level of 0.05, we accept the Alternative Hypothesis.

Conclusion:

The ANOVA: single factor analysis yielded a P-value less than 0.05, leading to rejecting the Null Hypothesis. This confirms that at least one of them– Naorem Mahesh Singh, Nandha Kumar Sekar, Lallianzuala Chhangte, and Manvir Singh—has a significantly different preference level among respondents.

 

 

Leave a comment