{"id":25110,"date":"2026-03-27T22:58:51","date_gmt":"2026-03-27T17:28:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=25110"},"modified":"2026-03-27T22:58:51","modified_gmt":"2026-03-27T17:28:51","slug":"comparative-analysis-of-chips-brands-used-in-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=25110","title":{"rendered":"Comparative Analysis of Chips Brands Used in India"},"content":{"rendered":"

Title: Comparative Analysis of Chips Brands Used in India<\/span><\/b> <\/b><\/p>\n

Author<\/span><\/b>: Jatin Patil 37<\/b><\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span>Introduction:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Chips are a popular snack enjoyed by people of all ages in India. They are known for their crispy texture and savory flavors, making them a favorite accompaniment to gatherings, movies, and casual snacking. The Indian market offers a wide range of chips brands, each catering to different taste preferences and consumer needs. Popular brands such as Balaji, Lays, Bingo, and Too Yumm are widely consumed and known for their distinct flavors, packaging, and marketing strategies. This research aims to explore the different chips brands available in India, compare their ingredients, flavor profiles, and consumer preferences, and understand their impact on the snack food industry in India.<\/span><\/p>\n

Objective:<\/span><\/b> To determine which Chips brands are most popular among consumers<\/span><\/p>\n

Literature review:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

This review by <\/span>Gupta and Mehta (2018)<\/span><\/strong> explores the behavior and preferences of consumers towards potato chips in India. The study highlights that flavor innovation, convenience, and attractive packaging play a significant role in shaping consumer choices. It also discusses how local flavors like masala and tangy options dominate the Indian market, with international brands like Lays gaining popularity due to their brand presence. Additionally, the growing demand for healthier snack alternatives, such as baked chips, is discussed in the context of increasing health awareness among consumers.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span>In the study by <\/span>Sharma and Joshi (2017)<\/span><\/strong>, the authors analyze how branding and marketing strategies influence the Indian snack food industry, particularly the chips market. The research emphasizes the role of celebrity endorsements, digital marketing, and social media in boosting brand recognition. It also highlights the significance of localized flavors and region-specific products in building strong consumer loyalty. The paper concludes that effective marketing strategies and brand differentiation are key to success in the highly competitive Indian snack market.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Data collection:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

The data for this study was collected to analyze consumer preferences for four different Chips \u00a0<\/span>brands: Balaji Waffer, Lays, Bingo, Too Yumm.<\/span><\/p>\n

A total of 128 respondents were selected for the study. The respondents were divided into four groups, with 32 individuals in each group, representing each Chips brand.<\/span><\/p>\n

The data was collected using a only chips name without giving any information , where each respondent was asked to rate their respective Chips name. <\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Data Analysis:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Anova: Single Factor<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

SUMMARY<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Groups<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Count<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Sum<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Average<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Variance<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Balaji<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

32<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

206<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6.4375<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6.6411<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Lays<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

32<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

183<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5.7188<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5.1119<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Bingo<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

32<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

185<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5.7813<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.4667<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Too yumm<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

32<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

223<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6.9688<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.3538<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

ANOVA<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Source of Variation<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

SS<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

df<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

MS<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

F<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

P-value<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

F crit<\/span><\/i><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Between Groups<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

33.65<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11.2161<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.2921<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.0814<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.6777<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Within Groups<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

606.8<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

124<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

4.8934<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Total<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

640.4<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

127<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

The data collected from 128 respondents (32 for each brand) was analyzed using average values and ANOVA. The chips brands included Balaji, Lays, Bingo, and Too Yumm. Among these, Too Yumm has the highest average rating (6.97), followed by Balaji (6.44), Bingo (5.78), and Lays (5.72). The differences in average ratings are relatively small. The ANOVA results show an F-value of 2.2921, which is less than the critical value of 2.6777, and the P-value is 0.0814, which is greater than 0.05. This indicates that there is no significant difference in the ratings of the chips brands.
<\/span><\/strong>
Conclusion:<\/span><\/h3>\n

Based on the analysis, it is concluded that there is no significant difference in the ratings of Balaji, Lays, Bingo, and Too Yumm. Although Too Yumm has a slightly higher average, the difference is not statistically significant. Therefore, all four chips brands are rated almost equally by consumers.<\/span><\/p>\n

Reference:<\/span><\/b><\/p>\n

Gupta, S., & Mehta, S. (2018). Consumer behavior and preferences towards packaged snack foods in India: The case of potato chips. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55<\/em>(6), 2348-2355.<\/p>\n

Sharma, R., & Joshi, A. (2017). Branding and marketing strategies in India\u2019s snack food industry: Insights from chips market. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 9<\/em>(4), 78-85.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Title: Comparative Analysis of Chips Brands Used in India Author: Jatin Patil 37 \u00a0Introduction: Chips are a popular snack enjoyed by people of all ages in India. They are known for their crispy texture and savory flavors, making them a favorite accompaniment to gatherings, movies, and casual snacking. The Indian market offers a wide range… Continue reading Comparative Analysis of Chips Brands Used in India<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":140168,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-25110","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25110","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/140168"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=25110"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25110\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25111,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25110\/revisions\/25111"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=25110"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=25110"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=25110"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}