{"id":21954,"date":"2024-10-26T07:57:27","date_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:27:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21954"},"modified":"2024-10-26T07:57:27","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:27:27","slug":"comparison-of-four-preferred-social-media-networking-apps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21954","title":{"rendered":"Comparison of Four Preferred Social Media Networking Apps"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong><u>Title<\/u><\/strong><strong>: Comparison of Four <\/strong><strong>Preferred Social Media Networking Apps: Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter), and LinkedIn<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Author<\/u><\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Pratiksha Tanavade<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Introduction<\/u><\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> This report explores the popularity and usage of four prominent social media networking apps: Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter), and LinkedIn. Facebook is known for its wide-ranging social connections and multimedia sharing, Instagram excels in photo and video sharing with an aesthetic focus, X (Twitter) is the hub for real-time updates and public discourse, and LinkedIn serves as the professional networking platform.<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Objective<\/u><\/strong><strong>: <\/strong>To find out all are same or any one of them is different between the preferred social media networking apps among the participants.<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Data Collection:<\/u><\/strong> 20 students of ITM Business School were surveyed. They rated these apps on a scale of 1 to 10 via a Google Form, with 1 representing the lowest preference and 10 the highest. Following the data collection, the ANOVA: Single Factor test was then performed to compare the means of the ratings across the four networking social media apps.<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Data Analysis<\/u><\/strong><strong>:<\/strong><\/p>\n<table width=\"689\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"175\">\n<p><strong><u>ANOVA<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"175\">\n<p><strong><em><u>Source of Variation<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p><strong><em><u>SS<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p><strong><em><u>df<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p><strong><em><u>MS<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p><strong><em><u>F<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p><strong><em><u>P-value<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p><strong><em><u>F crit<\/u><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"175\">\n<p><strong><u>Between Groups<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>131.7022<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>43.90072<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>5.649399<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p><strong><u>0.001379<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>2.708186<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"175\">\n<p><strong><u>Within Groups<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>683.8361<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>88<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>7.770865<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"175\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td width=\"175\">\n<p><strong><u>Total<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>815.5383<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>91<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td width=\"86\">\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong><u>\u00a0<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><u>The hypotheses for the test are: <\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Null Hypothesis (H\u2080): <\/strong>There is no significant difference in the average ratings of Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter), and LinkedIn.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Alternative Hypothesis (H\u2081): <\/strong>There is a significant difference in the average ratings of at least one pair of Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter), and LinkedIn.<\/p>\n<p>If the P-value is less than the significance level (commonly 0.05), we reject the null hypothesis and accept alternate hypothesis and if P-value is more than the significance level, we reject the alternate hypothesis and accept null hypothesis.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Conclusion<\/u><\/strong><strong>:<\/strong> Since the <strong>P-value<\/strong> of <strong>0.0014, <\/strong>which is less than the 0.05 significance level, we <strong>Reject<\/strong> the <strong>Null Hypothesis (H\u2080)<\/strong>, indicating a statistically significant difference in the ratings of at least one pair of social media apps. Therefore, the <strong>Alternative Hypothesis (H\u2081) <\/strong>is <strong>accepted<\/strong>, indicating that preferences vary among Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter), and LinkedIn.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Title: Comparison of Four Preferred Social Media Networking Apps: Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter), and LinkedIn Author: Pratiksha Tanavade Introduction: This report explores the popularity and usage of four prominent social media networking apps: Facebook, Instagram, X (Twitter), and LinkedIn. Facebook is known for its wide-ranging social connections and multimedia sharing, Instagram excels in photo and&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21954\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Comparison of Four Preferred Social Media Networking Apps<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":139450,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21954","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21954","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/139450"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21954"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21954\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21955,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21954\/revisions\/21955"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21954"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21954"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21954"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}