{"id":21936,"date":"2024-10-26T07:57:44","date_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:27:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21936"},"modified":"2024-10-26T07:57:44","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:27:44","slug":"comparison-of-four-mobile-brand","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21936","title":{"rendered":"Comparison of Four Mobile Brand"},"content":{"rendered":"

Mobile Brand Preference Using ANOVA: Single Factor<\/strong><\/p>\n

Akash Upadhyay<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

F4 2024-26 \u2013021330024040, ITM Business School, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Introduction:<\/strong> This report aims to understand the preferences of students at ITM Business School regarding four major Mobile brands. Apple, Samsung, Oppo, and MI. Each brand is known for its distinct characteristics, with Apple focusing on inclusivity, MI offering affordability, Oppo leading in trendy products, and Samsung excelling in innovation. By analysing student\u2019s preferences, this report will provide insights into brand perceptions and key factors influencing their Mobile brand choices<\/p>\n

Objective:<\/strong> To find out if there are significant differences in the preferences (ratings) of ITM students for the mentioned Mobile Brands.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Data Collection:<\/strong> Students of ITM Business School were surveyed. Each student rated four Mobile brands i.e. Apple, Samsung, Oppo and MI on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 indicates low preference and 10 indicates high preference. The ratings for each Mobile brands were recorded for analysis<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Data Analysis: <\/strong>The ANOVA: Single Factor test was performed to compare the means of the ratings across the four Mobile brands<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

The hypotheses for the test are:<\/p>\n

Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no significant difference in the average ratings of Apple, Samsung, oppo and MI<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Alternate Hypothesis (H1): At least one of the Mobile Brand has a significantly different average rating.<\/p>\n

The results of carrying out ANOVA: Single Factor test is shown below<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

ANOVA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Source of Variation<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

SS<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

df<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

MS<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

F<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

P-value<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

F crit<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Between Groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8.114583<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.704861<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.144989<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.028893<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.703594<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Within Groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

79.125<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

92<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.860054<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Total<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

87.23958<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

95<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Since the P-value is 0.02 which is smaller than the standard significance level of 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis<\/p>\n

Conclusion:<\/strong> There is at least one Mobile brand which has a significant difference in the ratings given by the students of ITM. Therefore, all are not the same.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Mobile Brand Preference Using ANOVA: Single Factor Akash Upadhyay \u00a0 F4 2024-26 \u2013021330024040, ITM Business School, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai \u00a0 Introduction: This report aims to understand the preferences of students at ITM Business School regarding four major Mobile brands. Apple, Samsung, Oppo, and MI. Each brand is known for its distinct characteristics, with Apple focusing… Continue reading Comparison of Four Mobile Brand<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":139565,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[38],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-finance","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21936","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/139565"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21936"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21936\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21937,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21936\/revisions\/21937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}