{"id":21812,"date":"2024-10-26T07:58:19","date_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:28:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21812"},"modified":"2024-10-26T07:58:19","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:28:19","slug":"a-comparison-of-the-four-luggage-bags-tommy-hilfiger-american-tourister-safari-vip","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21812","title":{"rendered":"A comparison of the four Luggage Bags Tommy Hilfiger, American tourister, Safari, VIP"},"content":{"rendered":"

Luggage Bags<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Title: <\/strong>\u00a0A comparison of the four Luggage Bags Tommy Hilfiger, American tourister, Safari, VIP<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Author: <\/strong>Prasad Gulve<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Introduction:<\/strong>\u00a0 Tommy Hilfiger, American Tourister, Safari, and VIP each offer unique luggage options that blend style and functionality. Tommy Hilfiger brings a classic American aesthetic, while American Tourister focuses on colorful, durable designs for families. Safari emphasizes high-quality, lightweight materials, and VIP is known for its reliability and smart organization. Together, these brands cater to diverse traveler needs, ensuring stylish and practical choices for every journey.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Objectives: <\/strong>\u00a0To compare the four Luggage Bags Tommy Hilfiger, American ourister, Safari, VIP<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Data Collection<\/strong> : <\/strong>\u00a0Gathered feedback from own friends about Tommy Hilfiger, American Tourister, Safari, VIP, asking them to rate specific aspects on a scale of 1 to 10.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Data Analysis : <\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Anova: Single Factor<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

SUMMARY<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Groups<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Count<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Sum<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Average<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Variance<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Tommy Hilfiger<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

149<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7.45<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.892105<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

American tourister<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

139<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

6.95<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.576316<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Safari<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

146<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7.3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.589474<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

VIP<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

20<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

153<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

7.65<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.081579<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

ANOVA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Source of Variation<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

SS<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

df<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

MS<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

F<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

P-value<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

F crit<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Between Groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

5.2375<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

1.745833<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.575258<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.633024<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.724944<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Within Groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

230.65<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

76<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3.034868<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Total<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

235.8875<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

79<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Hypothesis : <\/strong><\/p>\n

Null Hypothesis <\/strong>: <\/strong>\u00a0\u00a0All are the same.<\/p>\n

Alternative Hypothesis<\/strong> :\u00a0 Anyone of them is different.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Conclusion :<\/strong> \u00a0Since the P-value is more than (0.05), we accept the null hypothesis. This means that there is sufficient evidence to conclude that all the Luggage bags have the same average rating.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Name : Prasad Gulve<\/strong><\/p>\n

Batch : F4<\/strong><\/p>\n

Roll No. : 021330124033<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Luggage Bags \u00a0 Title: \u00a0A comparison of the four Luggage Bags Tommy Hilfiger, American tourister, Safari, VIP \u00a0 Author: Prasad Gulve \u00a0 Introduction:\u00a0 Tommy Hilfiger, American Tourister, Safari, and VIP each offer unique luggage options that blend style and functionality. Tommy Hilfiger brings a classic American aesthetic, while American Tourister focuses on colorful, durable designs… Continue reading A comparison of the four Luggage Bags Tommy Hilfiger, American tourister, Safari, VIP<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":139583,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21812","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-management","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21812","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/139583"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21812"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21812\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21813,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21812\/revisions\/21813"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21812"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21812"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21812"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}