{"id":21810,"date":"2024-10-26T07:58:19","date_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:28:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21810"},"modified":"2024-10-26T07:58:19","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:28:19","slug":"analysis-of-customer-preference-mobile-brands","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21810","title":{"rendered":"ANALYSIS OF CUSTOMER PREFERENCE: MOBILE BRANDS"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 TITLE: <\/strong>ANALYSIS OF CUSTOMER PREFERENCE: MOBILE BRANDS<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 AUTHOR:<\/strong> RAHUL VIJAY SHIRKE (021330024241)<\/p>\n

INTRODUCTION: <\/strong>Apple, Samsung, Vivo, and OPPO are leading smartphone brands offering diverse devices. Apple uses iOS, while others use Android. Apple’s ecosystem is tightly integrated, while others have their own ecosystems. Apple is often seen as a pioneer in innovation, while others also offer innovative features. Apple’s smartphones tend to be more expensive than others, but this can vary.<\/p>\n

OBJECTIVE:<\/strong> THE OBJEVTIVE IS TO DO A SURVEY AND EVALUATE CUSTOMER PREFERENCES.<\/p>\n

DATA COLLECTIONS:<\/strong> the data was collected from a survey of 30 people use google form. Then question were answered in the range of 1 to 10 where 1 being least preferred and 10 being most preferred. Then the data was analysed using single factor ANOVA.<\/p>\n

DATA ANALYSIS: <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
\n

Anova: Single Factor<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

SUMMARY<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Groups<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Count<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Sum<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Average<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

Variance<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Column 1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

347<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11.56667<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

214.6678<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Column 2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

339<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11.3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

159.3207<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Column 3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

256<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8.533333<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.395402<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Column 4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

30<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

254<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

8.466667<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.326437<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

ANOVA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Source of Variation<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

SS<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

df<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

MS<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

F<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

P-value<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

F crit<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Between Groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

259.2667<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

86.42222<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.92255<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

0.432321<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

2.682809<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

\n

Within Groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

10866.6<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

116<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

93.67759<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\n

Total<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

11125.87<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

119<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

HYPOTHESIS: <\/strong><\/p>\n

H0<\/sub>(Null Hypothesis): – <\/strong>There is no significant difference in the consumer ratings among the four Mobile brands all ratings are the same.<\/p>\n

H1 (Alternative Hypothesis): <\/strong>At least one Mobile brand’s consumer rating is significantly different from the others.<\/p>\n