{"id":21726,"date":"2024-10-26T07:58:47","date_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:28:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21726"},"modified":"2024-10-26T07:58:47","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:28:47","slug":"it-is-a-survey-report-that-represents-analysis-of-the-ratings-given-by-students-of-four-tv-brands","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21726","title":{"rendered":":- It is a survey report that represents analysis of the ratings given by students of four TV Brands"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Ratings Given To 4 TV Brands By Students<\/p>\n

Author :- Sandesh Naik<\/p>\n

Roll no :- 0213309224021<\/p>\n

Batch :- F (3)<\/p>\n

Introduction :- It is a survey report that represents analysis of the ratings given by students of four TV Brands<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. LG :- Is well-known for its televisions, audio systems, and home entertainment devices. They are a leading manufacturer of OLED TVs, offering superior picture quality. Home Appliances: The brand offers a range of appliances, including refrigerators, washing machines, air conditioners, and kitchen appliances, often featuring smart technology and energy efficiency.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n

      \n
    1. OnePlus :- was established in 2013, known for producing high-quality smartphones at competitive \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The brand initially gained fame with its flagship killer phones, offering premium features with a clean software experience. Community Engagement: OnePlus emphasizes community feedback in its product development, fostering a loyal user base. Expansion: In recent years, OnePlus has diversified into other products like earbuds, smart TVs, and wearables.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

      \u00a0<\/p>\n

        \n
      1. Samsung :- It was founded in 1938 and is a global leader in consumer electronics and technology. The company offers a vast array of products, including smartphones, TVs, home appliances, and semiconductors. Innovation: Known for its cutting-edge technology, Samsung is a pioneer in OLED displays and 5G smartphones. Samsung holds a significant share of the global smartphone market and is recognized for its Galaxy line of devices.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        \u00a0<\/p>\n

        \u00a0<\/p>\n

          \n
        1. Sony :- It was established in 1946 and has grown into a leading multinational conglomerate known for electronics and entertainment. The brand is famous for its gaming consoles (PlayStation), audio devices, and cameras, alongside its film and music divisions.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n

          \u00a0 Objective :- To compare Ratings of 4 TV Brands.<\/p>\n

          Data Collection :- The Data was collected through google form by giving rating on the scale of 1 to 10 of 4 TV brand by 25 students of my class. Data collected was then put up in excel where Anova 1 factor or single factor test was performed from data analysis tool.<\/p>\n

          Data Analysis:- the collected data was put in excel Where ANOVA single single factor test was performed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
          \n

          Anova: Single Factor<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \n

          SUMMARY<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \n

          Groups<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          Count<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          Sum<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          Average<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          Variance<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \n

          Column 1<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          25<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          185<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          7.4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          4.583333<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \n

          Column 2<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          25<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          164<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          6.56<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          4.84<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \n

          Column 3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          25<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          187<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          7.48<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          7.76<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \n

          Column 4<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          25<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          233<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          9.32<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          1.06<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \n

          ANOVA<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \n

          Source of Variation<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          SS<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          df<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          MS<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          F<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          P-value<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          F crit<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

          \n

          Between Groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          101.55<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          3<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          33.85<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          7.421889<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          0.000159819<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          2.699393<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n

          \n

          Within Groups<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          437.84<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          96<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          4.560833333<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
          \n

          Total<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          539.39<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          99<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n

          		\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n

          In this given table P value is less than 0.05 which means alternate hypothesis will be accepted.<\/strong><\/p>\n

          Conclusion :- This means that we have enough statistical evidence to support\u00a0 the alternative claim.<\/strong><\/p>\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n

          \u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

          \u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Ratings Given To 4 TV Brands By Students Author :- Sandesh Naik Roll no :- 0213309224021 Batch :- F (3) Introduction :- It is a survey report that represents analysis of the ratings given by students of four TV Brands LG :- Is well-known for its televisions, audio systems, and home entertainment devices. They… Continue reading :- It is a survey report that represents analysis of the ratings given by students of four TV Brands<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":139517,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-21726","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-movies-tv","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21726","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/139517"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=21726"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21726\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":21727,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21726\/revisions\/21727"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=21726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=21726"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=21726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}