{"id":21722,"date":"2024-10-26T07:58:47","date_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:28:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21722"},"modified":"2024-10-26T07:58:47","modified_gmt":"2024-10-26T02:28:47","slug":"anova-analysis-of-fashion-brands-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/?p=21722","title":{"rendered":"ANOVA Analysis of Fashion Brands."},"content":{"rendered":"

Fashion brands and their ratings.<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Smriti Ahuja (021330024578)<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

ITM Skills University.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Introduction<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0Some popular\u00a0fashion brands in India are Zudio, Zara, Pantaloon and H&M, these different fashion brands are known for their different characteristics with each brand leading in some or the other; For example, Zudio gives its customers a wide range of products with affordable price range\u00a0while Zara leads in trendy fashion sense. <\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Objective<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

To determine whether the customers are in a harmony while selecting fashion brands or their choices vary across the 4 brands.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Data Collection<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0To conduct this research the data was collected\u00a0from 25 students through a questionnaire with response ratings scaling from 1-10, 1 being least preferable and 10 being highest favourable, also post data collection single factor Anova was calculated to analyse the differences in ratings between the mentioned fashion brands.<\/span>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

Data Analysis<\/span><\/i><\/b>\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n<\/colgroup>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
ANOVA<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Source of Variation<\/td>\nSS<\/td>\ndf<\/td>\nMS<\/td>\nF<\/td>\nP-value<\/td>\nF crit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Between Groups<\/td>\n28.59<\/td>\n3<\/td>\n9.53<\/td>\n2.275820896<\/td>\n0.0846885109<\/td>\n2.699392598<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Within Groups<\/td>\n402<\/td>\n96<\/td>\n4.1875<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Total<\/td>\n430.59<\/td>\n99<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n\u00a0<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n