Title: Comparison of Watch Brands<\/p>\n
Author: Divya Mohite<\/p>\n
Introduction:
\nRolex, Seiko, Casio, and G-Shock are all well-known and respected watch brands that offer a wide
\nrange of timepieces to suit different styles and budgets.
\nRolex is a Swiss luxury watch brand that was founded in 1905. They are known for their high-quality
\ncraftsmanship, iconic designs, and status symbol status. Some of their popular models include the
\nSubmariner, Daytona, and GMT-Master.
\nSeiko is a Japanese watch brand that was founded in 1881. They are known for their innovative
\ndesigns, high accuracy, and affordability. Some of their popular models include the Seiko 5, Prospex,
\nand Presage.
\nCasio is a Japanese brand that produces a wide range of watches, including digital and analog
\nmodels. They are known for their durability, functionality, and affordability. Some of their popular
\nmodels include the G-Shock, Edifice, and Pro Trek.
\nG-Shock is a sub-brand of Casio that produces watches that are designed for rugged use and extreme
\nsports. They are known for their shock-resistant technology, bold designs, and durability. Some of
\ntheir popular models include the Mudmaster, Rangeman, and Frogman.
\nOverall, these brands have established themselves as leaders in the watch industry by offering a
\nrange of styles and features to suit different tastes and needs.<\/p>\n
Objective: To compare the likeability of Watch Brands
\n1. Rolex
\n2. Seiko
\n3. Casio
\n4. G Shock
\nTest Hypothesis: H0 all are same, H1 at least one of them is different.<\/p>\n
Data Collection: Four best cartoon brands were selected for this Project: One Way ANOVA.
\nStudents of the class were requested to grade the brands out of 10 and then One Way
\nANOVA was calculated.<\/p>\n
Data analysis:<\/p>\n
Anova: Single
\nFactor
\nSUMMARY
\nGroups Count Sum Average Variance
\nROLEX 40 332 8.3 4.523076923
\nSEIKO 40 274 6.85 5.053846154
\nCASIO 40 318 7.95 4.561538462
\nGSHOCK 40 303 7.575 5.737820513
\nANOVA
\nSource of
\nVariation<\/p>\n
SS df MS F P-value F crit<\/p>\n
Between
\nGroups<\/p>\n
46.26875 3 15.42291667 3.103783017 0.028338262 2.66256854
\n9<\/p>\n
Within
\nGroups<\/p>\n
775.175 156 4.969070513<\/p>\n
Total 821.44375 159 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/p>\n
The ANOVA table shows that the \u201cBetween Groups\u201d factor has a sum of squares (SS) of
\n46.26875, a degree of freedom (df) of 3, and a mean square (MS) of 15.42291667.
\nThe \u201cWithin Groups\u201d factor has an SS of 775.175 and a df of 156, resulting in an MS of
\n4.969070.
\nThe F-ratio calculated by dividing the MS for the \u201cBetween Groups\u201d factor by the MS for the
\n\u201cWithin Groups\u201d factor is 3.10379, which corresponds to a P-value of 0.028338262.
\nThe P-value associated with the F-ratio is 0.028338262, which is smaller than the
\nconventional threshold of 0.05. This indicates that there is a significant difference between
\nthe means of the groups.
\nThe critical F-value for this analysis, based on a significance level of 0.05 and the degrees of
\nfreedom for the \u201cBetween Groups\u201d and \u201cWithin Groups\u201d factors, is 2.662568549. The
\nobtained F-ratio is greater than the critical F-value, indicating that there is a significant
\ndifference between the means of the groups.
\nH1 accepted.<\/p>\n
Conclusion: At least one of them is different.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Title: Comparison of Watch Brands Author: Divya Mohite Introduction: Rolex, Seiko, Casio, and G-Shock are all well-known and respected watch brands that offer a wide range of timepieces to suit different styles and budgets. Rolex is a Swiss luxury watch brand that was founded in 1905. They are known for their high-quality craftsmanship, iconic designs,… Continue reading one way Anova (Comparison of Watch Brands)<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":112124,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/112124"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=17673"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17673\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17680,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17673\/revisions\/17680"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=17673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=17673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.sachdevajk.in\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=17673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}