Last Updated:
May 30, 2020

Click here to submit your article
Legal Issues
Per Page :

You have five sub categories

Aditya Birla Group Files Copyright Infringement Suit against Kolkata-Based MP Birla Group

Name: Aniket Dhok, Roll No: M1907, College Name:- Fr. C Rodrigues Institute of Management Studies. Aditya Birla Group-owned Grasim Industries and Ultratech Cement have filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against the Harsh Vardhan Lodha-controlled MP Birla Group in the Bombay High Court, accusing it of the unauthorized use of the word ‘ultra’ in its cement brands. Mumbai-based Ultratech Cement of the Aditya Birla Group has claimed that two of Kolkata-based MP Birla Group brands, namely P Birla Cement Ultimate Ultra and MP Birla Cement Ultimate Ultra 2, have infringed its trademark by using the word ‘ultra’. The petition filed in Read More
0 Views : 41

SAMSUNG V/S APPLE DISPUTE

NAME:- Shweta thakur Roll No:- Mm1952 College:- Fr C Rodrigues institute of management studies SAMSUNG V/S APPLE DISPUTE apple and Samsung electronic ltd was the first series of war between these 2 smartphone companies were regarding the design of Phone and software . apple claim patent infringement suits because there was already patent war going between apple and motorola . on August 2011 , apple and samsung were litigating 19 ongoing cases in nine countries by October it expanded across ten countries . both the company claim for charging penalty of billion of dollars .apple won a ruling in its Read More
0 Views : 44

PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED V. RATHI ADHESIVE INDUSTRIES & ANR

NAME :PRANITA PATHAR ROLL NO :M1936 COLLEGE NAME: FR. C. RODRIGUES INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES. PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED… V. RATHI ADHESIVE INDUSTRIES & ANR.… The question arose in this application whether the respondent has infringed the right of the petitioner as a registered proprietor of the Trade Mark including the pictorial device which is used by the petitioner for its product. The petitioner is a manufacturer of synthetic adhesive sold under the well known brand ‘Fevicol’. The petitioner was and is still marketing the said product in plastic jars, containers, tins and tubes, besides the said trade name ‘Fevicol’ contains, Read More
0 Views : 41

RELIANCE INDUSTRY WIN PMT COURT CASE AGAINST GOVERNMENT IN ENGLISH HC

Name: Rishab Thakur Roll no: M1941 College name:- Fr C Rodrigues institute of management and studies SUMMARY : RELIANCE INDUSTRY WIN PMT COURT CASE AGAINST GOVERNMENT IN ENGLISH HC There was a dispute against the reliance industry and the indian government regarding estimated production of oil but they produced more oil and gas. so the government of India claims the penalty of $3. 5 billion on october 2016 . The government of India thought they would get a partial award for an international arbitration tribunal over the recovery of certain costs from the sale of oil and gas production. But Read More
0 Views : 31

Indian Coal Allocation Scam (Jindal Steel and Power)

Coal allocation scam (or Coalgate) is a major political scandal concerning the Indian government’s allocation of the nation’s coal deposits to public sector enterprise (PSEs) and private companies. In a draft report issued in March 2014, the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) office accused the Government of India of allocating coal blocks in an inefficient manner during the period 2004–2009. Over the Summer of 2012, resulting in a Central Bureau of Investigation probe into whether the allocation of the coal blocks was in fact influenced by corruption. The essence of the CAG’s argument is that the Government had Read More
0 Views : 36

Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v/s The State of Assam & Others

Name:- Amrutha joy Rollno:- M1906 College name:- Fr C Rodrigues Institute of management and studies(FCRIMS) Batch 2019-2021 Atiabari Tea Co. Ltd. v/s The State of Assam & Others The Constitutional validity of the Assam Taxation (on Goods Carried by Roads or Inland Waterways) Act, (Assam Act XIII of 1954) (hereinafter referred to as Act) has been challenged under the present appeal before the Honourable Supreme Court through Article 32 of the Constitution. As per facts, the appellants are the growers of tea in West Bengal or in Assam and carry their tea to the market in Calcutta from where the Read More
0 Views : 36

Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha – Minal Robert Kinny (case study )

Name and Roll No: Minal Robert Kinny M1930 (FCRIMS) CASE SUMMARY Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha Petitioner: Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd Respondent: Pampa Sinha Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha Petitioner was a finance company. They used to give personal loan against pledge of gold. According to the respondent, she took loan upon pledge of gold ornaments on February 19, 2008 and February 25, 2008. The finance company disbursed rupees sixty-three thousand and three hundred on two different dates being rupees twenty-five thousand three hundred on March 19, 2008 and rest rupees thirty-eight thousand on May 24, Read More
0 Views : 36

Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha – Minal Robert Kinny (case study )

Name and Roll No: Minal Robert Kinny M1930 (FCRIMS) CASE SUMMARY Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha Petitioner: Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd Respondent: Pampa Sinha Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha Petitioner was a finance company. They used to give personal loan against pledge of gold. According to the respondent, she took loan upon pledge of gold ornaments on February 19, 2008 and February 25, 2008. The finance company disbursed rupees sixty-three thousand and three hundred on two different dates being rupees twenty-five thousand three hundred on March 19, 2008 and rest rupees thirty-eight thousand on May 24, Read More
0 Views : 22

Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha – Minal Robert Kinny (case study )

Name and Roll No: Minal Robert Kinny M1930 (FCRIMS) CASE SUMMARY Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha Petitioner: Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd Respondent: Pampa Sinha Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha Petitioner was a finance company. They used to give personal loan against pledge of gold. According to the respondent, she took loan upon pledge of gold ornaments on February 19, 2008 and February 25, 2008. The finance company disbursed rupees sixty-three thousand and three hundred on two different dates being rupees twenty-five thousand three hundred on March 19, 2008 and rest rupees thirty-eight thousand on May 24, Read More
0 Views : 24

Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha – Minal Robert Kinny (case study )

Name and Roll No: Minal Robert Kinny M1930 (FCRIMS) CASE SUMMARY Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha Petitioner: Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd Respondent: Pampa Sinha Muthoot Finance Pvt. Ltd vs Pampa Sinha Petitioner was a finance company. They used to give personal loan against pledge of gold. According to the respondent, she took loan upon pledge of gold ornaments on February 19, 2008 and February 25, 2008. The finance company disbursed rupees sixty-three thousand and three hundred on two different dates being rupees twenty-five thousand three hundred on March 19, 2008 and rest rupees thirty-eight thousand on May 24, Read More
0 Views : 30