Trademark infringement is described because the unauthorized use of an indicator or carrier mark. This use may be in reference to items or offerings and can cause confusion, deception, or a false impression approximately the real enterprise a service or product got here from. Trademark proprietors can take criminal motion in the event that they accept as true with their marks are being infringed. If infringement of an indicator is proven, a courtroom docket order can save you a defendant from the usage of the mark, and the proprietor can be provided economic relief. A commercial court at Mirzapur ruled Read More

Name: Srushti Mokal Roll No: M2149 State Bank of India vs Metenere Ltd. Introduction: The case is concerning a vital issue on the appointment of an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 What is Interim Resolution Professional: appointment, qualifications, and disqualification? To be eligible for appointment, the IRP/RP must be independent of the corporate debtor. A person shall be considered independent of the corporate debtor if he: (a) is eligible to be appointed as an independent director on the board of the corporate debtor under Section 149 of the Companies Act, 2013 (18 of 2013), where Read More

Udaan, a business-to-business e-commerce startup, has filed a grievance with the Competition Commission of India (CCI). Against India’ largest biscuit maker, Parle Products. In its complaint, Udaan claims that Parle may be abusing its dominant position by refusing to provide its fast-moving merchandise on to the Bengaluru-based company for no reason. Parle is a dominant player within the marketplace for aldohexose biscuits in India. Its Parle-G biscuit is a ‘must-stock’ item for tiny and medium retailers and for platforms akin to Udaan. Udaan has aforementioned it’s relegated to buying Parle products from the open market, inflicting a competitive disadvantage, compared Read More