Last Updated:
March 8, 2023

Click here to submit your article
Legal Issues
Per Page :

You have five sub categories

Asian Paints (India) Ltd vs Inspector Of Legal Metrology

Asian Paints (India) Ltd vs Inspector Of Legal Metrology on 24 October, 2016 Bench: V.K. Jadhav CRI WP 409.2003 Asian Paints (India) Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 6A, Shantinagar, Santacruz (East), Mumbai 400055. Versus Inspector of Legal Metrology, Office of the Inspector of Legal Metrology, Dhule-2nd Section, House No. 7, Subhash Chowk, Near Mari Mata Temple, Dhule, Maharashtra. By of this Writ Petition, the petitioner Company seeks quashing of the Criminal complaint bearing STCC No.322 of 1999 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhule. Brief facts, giving rise to the Read More
0 Views : 97

Asian Paints (India) Ltd vs Inspector Of Legal Metrology

Asian Paints (India) Ltd vs Inspector Of Legal Metrology on 24 October, 2016 Bench: V.K. Jadhav CRI WP 409.2003 Asian Paints (India) Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 having its registered office at 6A, Shantinagar, Santacruz (East), Mumbai 400055. Versus Inspector of Legal Metrology, Office of the Inspector of Legal Metrology, Dhule-2nd Section, House No. 7, Subhash Chowk, Near Mari Mata Temple, Dhule, Maharashtra. By of this Writ Petition, the petitioner Company seeks quashing of the Criminal complaint bearing STCC No.322 of 1999 pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dhule. Brief facts, giving rise to the Read More
0 Views : 108

Legal cases on Sunderland football club

Sunderland have launched a £20m court action against a leading law firm in the latest chapter of the legal saga stemming from the signing of flop Ricky Alvarez in 2014. The Black Cats were forced to pay Alvarez’s former club Inter Milan £8.8m plus costs, and pay the player almost £5m in wages, following a hearing in front of football’s world governing body FIFA. Separately, Alvarez successfully brought a claim against Sunderland for wrongful termination of his contract, with FIFA’s dispute resolution chamber ordering the club to pay £4.2m plus interest. Sunderland appealed against the FIFA ruling in the Switzerland-based Read More
0 Views : 127

SYMPHONY LIMITED Versus RAJ COOLING SYSTEM PRIVATE LIMITED

Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Guj) 190 Symphony Limited formerly Symphony Comfort Systems Ltd provides residential mobile commercial packaged and central air cooling solutions for domestic and industrial customers in 60 countries across the globe. It is the world’s largest manufacturer of residential commercial and industrial air coolers. The suit was filed by Symphony Ltd. alleging infringement of the Designs Act by the Respondent company, alleging that the raj cooling system pvt ltd has been selling their product of air cooler having model name ALLWYN AC201 and ALLWYN AC203, whose is similar to Symphony’s design vide registration no. 288184 The Plaintiff Read More
0 Views : 101

Marico Limited VS Abhijeet Bhansali

Name: Mrinmayee S. Parab Roll No: M2127 MMS SEM II MARICO LIMITED V/S ABHIJEET BHANSALI Marico Limited, is one of the leading players in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) market in India, that manufactures and markets packaged edible oil, edible coconut oil, oats, hair oil, beauty products and other personal care products under its portfolio of various well-known and prestigious brands and one of its most well-known trademarks is PARACHUTE under which it markets inter alia its edible coconut oil; that the trademark PARACHUTE is amongst the most reputed brands owned by Marico Limited. PARACHUTE edible coconut oil is Read More
0 Views : 108

Legal cases of Zomato

introduction & background On 9th of March, 2021 one Hitesha Chandranee of Bangalore claimed that when she complained of her food delivery from Zomato getting delayed, she was assaulted by the delivery person (more particularly punched on the face).[1] The woman has posted a video of her bleeding nose online. While the woman herself was first booked by the police for assaulting the delivery guy. However, a day later the delivery boy – one Kamaraj was arrested and Zomato suspended him as per procedure. According to the delivery boy, the women assaulted him first and so he filed a complaint Read More
0 Views : 122

Vivo

NAME : VISHAL RADHAKRISHNA KURUP ROLL NO : M2160 FY MMS VIVO CASE STUDY CASE STUDY INTRODUCTION OF THE CASE : Recently Vivo India’s almost 23 associated firms such as Grand Prospect International Communications Pvt Ltd also known as (GPICPL) transferred huge amounts of its income to the parent firm , out of total sales proceeds of Rs1,25,185 crores the company remitted Rs 62,476 crores that is almost 50% of the total income out of India and most of the amount was remitted to China . COMPANY DETAILS : Vivo Communication Technology Co. Ltd., (styled as vivo), is a Chinese Read More
0 Views : 116

RELIANCE – FUTURE GROUP CASE

Rutuja Panvelkar – FYMMS( M2140) Reliance is among one of the most profitable industries in the world, reliance dominates the Indian market. It is alongside gradually growing as a dominant name in the international market by establishing its name extensively in various fields in the global market. Be it energy, natural gas, petrochemicals, mass media, telecommunications, e-commerce, television entertainment, music, retail or financial services, reliance’s outreach is widespread. Now, focusing on Future group, it is important to know that Future Group is a household name in India in today’s date since it’s retail/fashion industries are among the most dominant in Read More
0 Views : 95

Vedanta Resources PLC and Konkola Copper Mines PL v Lungowe and Others 2019 UKSC 20

Facts: 1,826 Zambian citizens who are resident in Chingola, Zambia filed a case against Konkola Copper Mines and Vedanta Resources Plc at the England and Wales Technology and Construction Court (hereinafter referred to as the UK High Court Division) on 31 July 2015. The claimants sought damages for personal injury, wide ranging environmental harm, damage to property, loss of income and amenity and enjoyment of land. The claims against both appellants were founded in negligence and breaches of applicable Zambian environmental laws. In effect, these proceedings were brought against Vedanta, a UK incorporated parent company, and its Zambian subsidiary. The Read More
0 Views : 96

VOLTAS LTD Vs Union of India and ORS

Introduction The case of M/S Voltas Ltd, Bombay V Union of India, the court examined the practices which amount to restrictive trade practices and also which are not in favor to the public interest. On December 18, 1969, the Parliament approved the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act, which went into effect on June 1 of the following year. However, as of September 1, 2009, the Competition Act 2002 took its place, making this Act no longer in effect. The Competition Commission of India took over as the monopolies and restrictive trade commission’s replacement. About the case The Monopolies Read More
0 Views : 96