Last Updated:
September 11, 2022

Click here to submit your article
Commercial Law
Per Page :

Jk Cement Limited vs Anav Industries & Anr on 23 March, 2022

Introduction: The case involves JK Cement Company which is an Indian multinational cement company. The company headquarter is in Kanpur, India. It is a leading cement manufacturing company in India. The Company has over four decades of experience in cement manufacturing with Grey Cement plants in Nimbahera, Mangrol and Gotan in Rajasthan and in Muddapur, Karnataka. A complaint has been filed by them against Anav Industries and Anr ,where they are being accused of copying the trademark of JK Cement to sell their products to the customers. Case Details: 02.03.2022, Plaintiff from its marketing team received complaints of and inquiries Read More
0 Views : 50

Ashutosh Dubey Vs Netflix

ASHUTOSH DUBEY VS NETFLIX, INC. This was the case were the plaintiff who is an advocate by profession filed a suit against an injunction against Netflix, the defendants for the further streaming of the episodes of a web series called hasmukh which aired on Netflix. The main issue in the case was regarding the defamation, caused due to some derogatory remarks made by the protagonist in a web-series known as “hasmukh”. The Delhi High Court dismissed an application filed by a lawyer, seeking an injunction against Netflix for streaming online content which was derogatory about the legal fraternity. The lawyer Read More
0 Views : 45

NIKE’S, INC. v. MARC KASKY

In 1996, Nike’s was accused of mistreating and underpaying workers at a foreign facility. Nike’s decided to answer these accusations in various ways. These included press releases, writing letters to editors of various newspapers around the country (USA) and mailing letters to university presidents and athletic directors. A report by former ambassador to the United Nations Andrew Young on the labour conditions at Nike’s production facilities was also published. In the report Young commented positively on the working conditions and found no evidence of the said accusations. In April 1998, respondent Marc Kasky, a California resident, sued Nike’s for unfair Read More
0 Views : 48

SYMPHONY LIMITED Versus RAJ COOLING SYSTEM PRIVATE LIMITED

Case Citation: 2022 LiveLaw (Guj) 190 Symphony Limited formerly Symphony Comfort Systems Ltd provides residential mobile commercial packaged and central air cooling solutions for domestic and industrial customers in 60 countries across the globe. It is the world’s largest manufacturer of residential commercial and industrial air coolers. The suit was filed by Symphony Ltd. alleging infringement of the Designs Act by the Respondent company, alleging that the raj cooling system pvt ltd has been selling their product of air cooler having model name ALLWYN AC201 and ALLWYN AC203, whose is similar to Symphony’s design vide registration no. 288184 The Plaintiff Read More
0 Views : 39

Marico Limited VS Abhijeet Bhansali

Name: Mrinmayee S. Parab Roll No: M2127 MMS SEM II MARICO LIMITED V/S ABHIJEET BHANSALI Marico Limited, is one of the leading players in the Fast Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG) market in India, that manufactures and markets packaged edible oil, edible coconut oil, oats, hair oil, beauty products and other personal care products under its portfolio of various well-known and prestigious brands and one of its most well-known trademarks is PARACHUTE under which it markets inter alia its edible coconut oil; that the trademark PARACHUTE is amongst the most reputed brands owned by Marico Limited. PARACHUTE edible coconut oil is Read More
0 Views : 47

Shoppers Stop Ltd. v. Vinod’s Shoppers Stop

Name: Sanchit Santosh Patil Class: FY MMS Roll No: M2142 Topic: Company Case Law College: Fr. C. Rodrigues Institute if Management Studies, Vashi – 400703 SHOPPERS STOP LTD. V. VINOD’S SHOPPERS STOP CASE NO: CS (OS) 1954/2015 ATTORNEY(S): Mr. Ankit Rustogi (Advocate), Mr. Jayant Kumar (Advocate) JUDGES: Hima Kohli, J. CASE LAW: A Plaintiff is a person who brings a case against another in the court of law. In this case, the Plaintiff was the proprietor of the mark ‘SHOPPERS STOP’ in all Classes and was using the same since 1991 as a trade mark and as part of trade Read More
0 Views : 36

Shoppers Stop Ltd. v. Vinod’s Shoppers Stop

SHOPPERS STOP LTD. V. VINOD’S SHOPPERS STOP CASE NO: CS (OS) 1954/2015 ATTORNEY(S): Mr. Ankit Rustogi (Advocate), Mr. Jayant Kumar (Advocate) JUDGES: Hima Kohli, J. CASE LAW: A Plaintiff is a person who brings a case against another in the court of law. In this case, the Plaintiff was the proprietor of the mark ‘SHOPPERS STOP’ in all Classes and was using the same since 1991 as a trade mark and as part of trade name. Over the years, Plaintiff’s Shoppers Stop had created a formidable reputation as a multi-brand retail chain of various products. In January 2015, the Plaintiff Read More
0 Views : 43

The Airborne Company Lawsuit

Airborne, the herbal supplement company that once called itself a “miracle cold buster,” was asked pay $23.3 million to settle a class action lawsuit over false advertising, according to published reports. Legal battles beginning in 2006 was called in to question the product’s claims to be able to stop the common cold. A February 2006 investigation by ABC’s “Good Morning America” found that Airborne’s clinical trial was conducted by just two people in the absence of a clinic or scientists. Airborne quickly changed their advertising campaign when a plaintiff filed suit against the company in March 2006. The company now Read More
0 Views : 36

Tata Sons Vs Cyrus Mistry

INTRODUCTION Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is a Tata Sons division that was established on April 1,1968. It is a global Indian information technology (IT) services and consulting firm located in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. Cyrus Mistry is an Indian businessman. He was the Chairman of the massive Tata Group business from 2012 until 2016. He also serves as a director of Cyrus Investments Private Limited. TIMELINE OF DISPUTES When Ratan Tata stepped down as Chairman of Tata Sons Limited in December 2012, Cyrus Mistry was appointed by a Tata Group selection panel. Cyrus Mistry was removed as chairman of Tata Sons Read More
0 Views : 39

Dabur India Ltd.: -A Case Study

In this case, Emami Ltd. had created an advertisement and TVC promoting its sugar free variant of chyawanprash. Aggrieved by the same, Dabur India Ltd., filed a suit against publication of these advertisements which it felt was meant to disparage “chyawanprash”. Then Emami modified its advertisement in accordance with the appellate Court’s judgment and submitted an affidavit stating that it will not publish its advertisement without making the modifications. Despite this, Dabur emphasized upon impugning the advertisements. The plaintiff contended that the defendant’s advertisement pertaining to sugar free chyawanprash was meant for diabetic patients and failed to disclose the same. Read More
0 Views : 47