Title: Comparison of IT services company in the industry

Author: Urvashi Rathod

Introduction:
In today’s world, where technology is the most important aspect. There are many emerging IT service providers. Namely IBM, TCS, Accenture, Cognizant, Capegemini. All these companies provide the best of services to their clients in terms of IT services.
International Business Machines Corporation is an American multinational technology and consulting company headquartered in Armonk, New York, with more than 350,000 employees serving clients in 170 countries
Tata Consultancy Services Limited is an Indian multinational information technology services and consulting company headquartered in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. It is a subsidiary of the Tata Group and operates in 149 locations across 46 countries. TCS is the second largest Indian company by market capitalisation.
Accenture plc is an American-Irish multinational professional services company. A Fortune Global 500 company, it reported revenues of $43.2 billion in 2019 and had 492,000 employees, serving clients in more than 120 countries
Cognizant is an American multinational product led digital corporation that provides digital products, digital IT services, including digital, technology, consulting, and operations services
Capgemini SE is a French multinational corporation that provides consulting, technology, professional, and outsourcing services. It is headquartered in Paris, France. Capgemini has over 270,000 employees in over 50 countries, of whom nearly 120,000 are in India

Objective:
To conduct survey and apply one way Anova technique to find associations with 5 IT service providers as factors.

Data Collection:
On the above factor, I have framed liner grading scale from 1 to 10 using Google form and approached 18 people to fill up the survey.

Data Analysis:
Anova Table generated by applying the excel data analysis technique on the sample survey using Google form.

Hypothesis: H0= All the providers are same.
H1= Any one of them is different.

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 11.82222 4 2.955556 1.661889 0.166385 2.479015
Within Groups 151.1667 85 1.778431

Total 162.9889 89

Conclusion: The calculated F(1.66) is less than the F(2.47) crit (Statistic), so accept H0 and reject H1, which means all providers are same.